Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1521 - 1530 of 2633, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(3), 274-283.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Matthew, R. F., Wang, M. Q., Bellamy, N., & Copeland, E. (2005). Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. American Journal of Health Studies, 20(3), 164–170.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

Mauricio, A. M., Rudo–Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Letham, K., & Lopez, M. (2019). Provider readiness and adaptations of competency drivers during scale–up of the Family Check–Up. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 40(1), 51–68.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

Mauricio, A. M., Rudo–Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Gill, A. M., Lundgren, J. S., & Thunberg, J. (2018). Facilitators and barriers in cross–country transport of evidence–based preventive interventions: A case study using the Family Check–Up. Prevention Science, 1–11.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

Mazzucchelli, T. G., Jenkins, M., & Sofronoff, K. (2018). Building Bridges Triple P: Pilot study of a behavioural family intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 76, 46–55.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17(3), 238-252.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

McAllister, C. L., & Thomas, T. (2007). Infant mental health and family support: Contributions of Early Head Start to an integrated model for community-based early childhood programs. Infant Mental Health Journal, 28(2), 192–215. doi:10.1002/imhj.20129

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option