Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1631 - 1640 of 2633, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Miller, K., Bourne, S., Dahl, C., Costello, C., Attinelly, J., Jennings, K., & Dozier, M. (2024). Using randomized controlled trials to ask questions regarding developmental psychopathology: A tribute to Dante Cicchetti. Development and Psychopathology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000245 [Study 1: Randomized controlled trial].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Miller, K., Bourne, S., Dahl, C., Costello, C., Attinelly, J., Jennings, K., & Dozier, M. (2024). Using randomized controlled trials to ask questions regarding developmental psychopathology: A tribute to Dante Cicchetti. Development and Psychopathology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000245 [Study 2: Non-experimental design].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Miller, T., Guyer, B., Bishai, D., Burkom, D., Clark, B., Cosslett, A., et al. (2003). Healthy Steps: The first three years affiliate evaluation final report. Baltimore: Women’s and Children’s Health Policy Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Miller, E. B., Hails, K. A., Canfield, C. F., Morris-Perez, P. A., Shaw, D. S., Mendelsohn, A. L., & Gross, R. S. (2024). Cognitive Stimulation and Maternal Feeding Styles in Families with Low Incomes: Impacts from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Academic Pediatrics, 25(2). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.acap.2024.09.012

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible comparison

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Miller, T., Hendrie, D., & Miller, T. R. (2015). Nurse Family Partnership: Comparing costs per family in randomized trials versus scale-up. Journal of Primary Prevention, 36(6), 419-425.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Miller, T., & Miller, T. R. (2015). Projected outcomes of Nurse-Family Partnership home visitation during 1996-2013, USA. Prevention Science, 16(6), 765-777.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Miller, Ted R., Olds, David, Knudtson, Michael, Luckey, Dennis, Bondy, Jessica, & Stevenson, Amanda. (2011) Return on investment: Nurse and paraprofessional home visitation, Denver. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Minkovitz, C. S., Hughart, N., Strobino, B. A., Scharfstein, D., Grason, H., Hou, W., et al. (2003). A practice-based intervention to enhance quality of care in the first 3 years of life: The Healthy Steps for Young Children Program. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(23), 3081–3091.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Minkovitz, C., Strobino, D., Hughart, N., Scharfstein, D., Guyer, B., & Healthy Steps Evaluation Team (2001). Early effects of the Healthy Steps for Young Children Program. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(4), 470–479.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Minkovitz, C. S., Strobino, D., Mistry, K. B., Scharfstein, D. O., Grason, H., Hou, W., Guyer, B. (2007). Healthy Steps for Young Children: Sustained results at 5.5 years. Pediatrics, 120(3), 658–668.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download