Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1391 - 1400 of 2601, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Lewis, R. E. (1990). Service-related correlates of treatment success in intensive family preservation services for child welfare. (University of Utah; 0240 Advisor: Chairman: Peter J. Pecora). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (03A), 248-1003. (AAG9025368)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, R. E. (1994). Application and adaptation of intensive family preservation services to use for  the reunification of foster-children with their biological parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(5-6), 339-361.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, R. E. (1995). Institutionalizing intensive family preservation services: A strategy for creating staffing standards based on projections of at-risk children from referral sources. Family Preservation Journal, 1(1) 87-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, J. (2011). Parenting programmes in England: Policy development and implementation issues, 2005–2010. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 33(2), 107-121.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, K., Ashby, K., McKelvey, L., & Fitzgerald, S. (2023). Arkansas Family First Prevention Services ACT Evaluation. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. https://medicine.uams.edu/familymedicine/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/202…

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Lewis, E. M., Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Fedoravicis, N., & Kohl, P. L. (2016). Child welfare involved parents and Pathways Triple P: perceptions of program acceptability and appropriateness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(12), 3760–3770.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, E. M., Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Fedoravicis, N., & Kohl, P. L. (2016). Child welfare involved parents and Pathways Triple P: Perceptions of program acceptability and appropriateness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(12), 3760–3770.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis-Morrarty, E., Dozier, M., Bernard, K., Terracciano, S., & Moore, S. (2012). Cognitive flexibility and theory of mind outcomes among foster children: Preschool follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(2 Suppl), S17-S22.

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewkowitz, A. K., López, J. D., Stein, R. I., Rhoades, J. S., Schulz, R. C., Woolfolk, C. L., … Cahill, A. G. (2018). Effect of a home-based lifestyle intervention on breastfeeding initiation among socioeconomically disadvantaged African American women with overweight or obesity. Breastfeeding Medicine: The Official Journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(6), 418–425.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Li, M. W., Baur, L. A., Rissel, C., Wardle, K., Alperstein, G., & Simpson, J. M. (2007). Early intervention of multiple home visits to prevent childhood obesity in a disadvantaged population: A home-based randomised controlled trial (Healthy Beginnings trial). BMC Public Health, 7, 76.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Beginnings

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download