Research database

Displaying 721 - 730 of 2490

Forehand, R., Parent, J., Sonuga-Barke, E., Peisch, V., Long, N., Abikoff, H., Peisch, V. D., & Abikoff, H. B. (2016). Which type of parent training works best for preschoolers with comorbid ADHD and ODD? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing generic and specialized programs. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, (8), 1503–1513. doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0138-8

Model(s) reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)
Rating: On hold
Forsythe, P. (1992). Homebuilders and family preservation. Children and Youth Services Review, 14(1-2), 37-47.
Model(s) reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Forte, S. (2019). Examination of an intergenerational literacy curriculum for parents and children in Liberia: A case study [Doctoral dissertation, Cabrini University].
Model(s) reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fosco, G. M., Frank, J. L., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2013). Opening the “Black Box”: family check-up intervention effects on self-regulation that prevents growth in problem behavior and substance use. Journal of School Psychology, 51(4), 455–468.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M. J., Connell, A. M., & Stormshak, E. A. (2016). Preventing adolescent depression with the family check-up: Examining family conflict as a mechanism of change. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(1), 82.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 305–318.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 305–318.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2016). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model: Corrigendum. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4), 1565.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Foskolos, K. (2015). The acceptability and efficacy of a brief universal preventive parenting intervention for child behavioural and emotional disorders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford). Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cb6b28fb-12ad-4e81-b6d3-2134f7dfaec8
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens

Foulon, S., Greacen, T., Pasquet, B., Dugravier, R., Saïas, T., Guedeney, N., . . . CAPEDP Study Group. (2015). Predictors of study attrition in a randomized controlled trial evaluating a perinatal home-visiting program with mothers with psychosocial vulnerabilities. PloS One, 10(11), e0142495.

Model(s) reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study