Research database

Displaying 121 - 130 of 305
Lewis, J. (2011). Parenting programmes in England: Policy development and implementation issues, 2005–2010. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 33(2), 107-121.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Long-term outcomes from a positive parenting program. (2010). Brown University Child & Adolescent Behavior Letter, 26(8), 2-2.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Love, S. M., Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M., Maurange, M., Knott, T., Prinz, R., . . . Ainsworth, A. T. (2016). Social media and gamification: Engaging vulnerable parents in an online evidence-based parenting program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 95–107.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Macdonald, W. (2014). The role of positive emotions within parenting interventions as part of therapeutic change (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester). Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.603175
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Marryat, L., Thompson, L., & Wilson, P. (2017). No evidence of whole population mental health impact of the Triple P parenting programme: Findings from a routine dataset. BMC Pediatrics, 17(1), 40.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(3), 274-283.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17(3), 238-252.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens