Early Start (New Zealand) Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2023

Effects shown in research

Maternal health

Findings rated moderate

Early Start (New Zealand)
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Percent any family/social relationship problem
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
36 months Christchurch sample 388 families % = 81.30 % = 82.90 = -1.60 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote150

Submitted by user on

High score equals unfavorable.

Percent ever pregnant to 36 months
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
36 months Christchurch sample 388 mothers % = 42.90 % = 47.60 = -4.70 Study reported = 0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote150

Submitted by user on

High score equals unfavorable.

Percent major depression
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
36 months Christchurch sample 388 mothers % = 36.00 % = 37.10 = -1.10 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote150

Submitted by user on

High score equals unfavorable.

Percent mother smoked cigarettes
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
36 months Christchurch sample 388 mothers % = 73.10 % = 68.90 = 4.20 Study reported = -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote150

Submitted by user on

High score equals unfavorable.

Percent substance use problems
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
36 months Christchurch sample 388 mothers % = 38.50 % = 33.00 = 5.50 Study reported = -0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote150

Submitted by user on

High score equals unfavorable.

View Revisions