SafeCare®

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2018

Effects shown in research

Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime

Findings rated high

SafeCare Augmented
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
CTS2 victimization, negotiation
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
10 months Rural Southwest 105 families Mean = 53.60 Mean = 50.00 Mean difference = 3.60 HomVEE calculated = 0.08 Statistically significant, p < 0.001
CTS2 victimization, negotiation
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
17 months Rural Southwest 105 families Mean = 51.10 Mean = 54.30 Mean difference = -3.20 HomVEE calculated = -0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CTS2 victimization, partnered
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
10 months Rural Southwest 105 families Mean = 0.48 Mean = 0.76 Mean difference = -0.28 HomVEE calculated = -0.75 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CTS2 victimization, partnered
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
17 months Rural Southwest 105 families Mean = 0.62 Mean = 0.72 Mean difference = -0.10 HomVEE calculated = -0.28 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Referral to child welfare for domestic violence
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
716 days Rural Southwest 105 families Unadjusted proportion = 0.00 Unadjusted proportion = 0.12 Mean difference = -0.12 Not available Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

View Revisions