Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 191 - 200 of 407, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Martin, C., Chen, H. W. B., & Dozier, J. (2022). Intervening with opioid-exposed newborns: Modifying an evidence-based parenting intervention. Delaware Journal of Public Health, 8, 94-98. https://doi.org/ 10.32481/djph.2022.05.014

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(3), 274-283.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Mazzucchelli, T. G., Jenkins, M., & Sofronoff, K. (2018). Building Bridges Triple P: Pilot study of a behavioural family intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 76, 46–55.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17(3), 238-252.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

McConnell, D., Breitkreuz, R., & Savage, A. (2012). Independent evaluation of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in family support service settings. Child & Family Social Work, 17(1), 43-54.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

McLennan, J. D. (2001). Behavioural family therapy reduced disruptive behaviour in children at risk for developing conduct problems. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 4(1), 20-20.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

McTaggart, P., & Sanders, M. R. (2003). The transition to school project: Results from the classroom. Advances in Mental Health, 2(3), 144-155.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX