Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 91 - 100 of 180, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Lewis, R. E. (1994). Application and adaptation of intensive family preservation services to use for  the reunification of foster-children with their biological parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(5-6), 339-361.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, R. E. (1995). Institutionalizing intensive family preservation services: A strategy for creating staffing standards based on projections of at-risk children from referral sources. Family Preservation Journal, 1(1) 87-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Linville, D., Chronister, K., Dishion, T., Todahl, J., Miller, J., Shaw, D., . . . Wilson, M. (2010). A longitudinal analysis of parenting practices, couple satisfaction, and child behavior problems. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(2), 244–255.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lunkenheimer, E. S., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Connell, A. M., Gardner, F., Wilson, M. N., & Skuban, E. M. (2008). Collateral benefits of the family check-up on early childhood school readiness: Indirect effects of parents’ positive behavior support. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1737–1752.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Margolis, K. (2013). A pilot feasibility and effectiveness trial of the family check-up parenting intervention with Spanish preadolescents and their families: A cultural adaptation and feasibility study to enhance evidence-based intervention research in Spain (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.)

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Mauricio, A. M., Rudo–Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Letham, K., & Lopez, M. (2019). Provider readiness and adaptations of competency drivers during scale–up of the Family Check–Up. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 40(1), 51–68.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Mauricio, A. M., Rudo–Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Gill, A. M., Lundgren, J. S., & Thunberg, J. (2018). Facilitators and barriers in cross–country transport of evidence–based preventive interventions: A case study using the Family Check–Up. Prevention Science, 1–11.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

McEachern, A. D., Fosco, G. M., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2013). Collateral benefits of the family check-up in early childhood: Primary caregivers’ social support and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(2), 271.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

McFarlane, E., Crowne, S. S., Burrell, L., & Duggan, A. (2014). Home-visiting service delivery and outcomes for depressed mothers. Zero to Three, 34(5), 53–60.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Miller, E. B., Hails, K. A., Canfield, C. F., Morris-Perez, P. A., Shaw, D. S., Mendelsohn, A. L., & Gross, R. S. (2024). Cognitive Stimulation and Maternal Feeding Styles in Families with Low Incomes: Impacts from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Academic Pediatrics, 25(2). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.acap.2024.09.012

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible comparison

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download XLSX