Research Manuscript Database
Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.
Search By
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Mauricio, A. M., Rudo–Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Letham, K., & Lopez, M. (2019). Provider readiness and adaptations of competency drivers during scale–up of the Family Check–Up. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 40(1), 51–68.
Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Mauricio, A. M., Rudo–Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Gill, A. M., Lundgren, J. S., & Thunberg, J. (2018). Facilitators and barriers in cross–country transport of evidence–based preventive interventions: A case study using the Family Check–Up. Prevention Science, 1–11.
Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Mazzucchelli, T. G., Jenkins, M., & Sofronoff, K. (2018). Building Bridges Triple P: Pilot study of a behavioural family intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 76, 46–55.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17(3), 238-252.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
McConnell, D., Breitkreuz, R., & Savage, A. (2012). Independent evaluation of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in family support service settings. Child & Family Social Work, 17(1), 43-54.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
McEachern, A. D., Fosco, G. M., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2013). Collateral benefits of the family check-up in early childhood: Primary caregivers’ social support and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(2), 271.
Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
McFarlane, E., Crowne, S. S., Burrell, L., & Duggan, A. (2014). Home-visiting service delivery and outcomes for depressed mothers. Zero to Three, 34(5), 53–60.
Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children