Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 131 - 140 of 192, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Schoemaker, N. K., Jagersma, G., Stoltenborgh, M., Maras, A., Vermeer, H. J., Juffer, F., & Alink, L. R. (2018). The effectiveness of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting for Foster Care (VIPP-FC): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychology, 6(1), 38.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Schoemaker, N. K., Juffer, F., Rippe, R. C. A., Vermeer, H. J., Stoltenborgh, M., Jagersma, G. J., Maras, A., & Alink, L. R. A. (2020). Positive parenting in foster care: Testing the effectiveness of a video-feedback intervention program on foster parents' behavior and attitudes. Children & Youth Services Review, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104779

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Shaw, D. S. (2000). Family-based prevention for early conduct problems. Grant Proposal.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shaw, D. S., Connell, A., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2009). Improvements in maternal depression as a mediator of intervention effects on early childhood problem behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 417–439.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Supplee, L., Gardner, F., & Arnds, K. (2006). Randomized trial of a family-centered approach to the prevention of early conduct problems: 2-year effects of the family check-up in early childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(1), 1–9.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shaw, D. S., Galán, C. A., Lemery–Chalfant, K., Dishion, T. J., Elam, K. K., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2019). Trajectories and predictors of children’s early–starting conduct problems: child, family, genetic, and intervention effects. Development and Psychopathology, 31(5), 1911–1921.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Shaw, D. S., Sitnick, S. L., Brennan, L. M., Choe, D. E., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2016). The long-term effectiveness of the family check-up on school-age conduct problems: Moderation by neighborhood deprivation. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4 Pt. 2), 1471–1486.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shelleby, E. C. (2015). Effects of the family check-up intervention on reducing growth in conduct problems in toddlerhood through school age: Moderators and moderated mediation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Cheong, J., Chang, H., Gardner, F., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2012). Behavioral control in at-risk toddlers: The influence of the family check-up. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41(3), 288–301.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2018). Effects of the Family Check–Up on reducing growth in conduct problems from toddlerhood through school age: An analysis of moderated mediation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(10), 856–867.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download XLSX