Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 61 - 70 of 155, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Julian, M. M., Muzik, M., Jester, J. M., Handelzalts, J., Erickson, N., Stringer, M., Brophy-Herb, H., Ribaudo, J., Huth-Bocks, A., Lawler, J., Stacks, A., Rosenblum, K. L., & Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research. (2021). Relationships heal: Reducing harsh parenting and child abuse potential with relationship-based parent-infant home visiting. Children and Youth Services Review, 128, Article 106135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106135

Model(s) Reviewed: Michigan Model of Infant Mental Health-Home Visiting (Michigan IMH-HV)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Julian, M. M., Riggs, J., Wong, K., Lawler, J. M., Brophy-Herb, H. E., Ribaudo, J., Stacks, A., Jester, J. M., Pitzen, J., Rosenblum, K. L., Muzik, M., & Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research. (2023). Relationships reduce risks for child maltreatment: Results of an experimental trial of infant mental health home visiting. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 979740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.979740

Model(s) Reviewed: Michigan Model of Infant Mental Health-Home Visiting (Michigan IMH-HV)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

King, C. A., Arango, A., & Foster, C. E. (2018). Emerging trends in adolescent suicide prevention research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 22, 89–94.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Krug, C. M. W., Hails, K. A., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2020). Child birth order as a moderator of intervention effectiveness for the early childhood version of the Family Check–Up. Prevention Science, 21,456–466.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kuklinski, M. R., Crowley, D. M., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., Pelham, W. E., & Shaw, D. S. (2020). Supporting strategic investment in social programs: A cost analysis of the Family Check–Up. Prevention Science, 21(2), 256–267.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kuo, S. I., Salvatore, J. E., Aliev, F., Ha, T., Dishion, T. J., & Dick, D. M. (2019). The Family Check–Up intervention moderates polygenic influences on long–term alcohol outcomes: Results from a randomized intervention trial. Prevention Science, 20(7), 975–985.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

O’Leary, C. C. (2001). The early childhood family check-up: A brief intervention for at-risk families with preschool-aged children. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 62(6-B), 2992.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Leijten, P., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Wilson, M. N., Matthys, W., & Dishion, T. J. (2015). Erratum to: The family check-up and service use in high-risk families of young children: A prevention strategy with a bridge to community-based treatment. Prevention Science, 16(3), 407.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Leijten, P., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Wilson, M. N., Matthys, W., & Dishion, T. J. (2015). The family check-up and service use in high-risk families of young children: A prevention strategy with a bridge to community-based treatment. Prevention Science, 16(3), 397–406.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lemery–Chalfant, K., Clifford, S., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2018). Genetic moderation of the effects of the Family Check–Up intervention on children’s internalizing symptoms: A longitudinal study with a racially/ethnically diverse sample. Development and Psychopathology, 30(5), 1729–1747.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download XLSX