Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 21 - 30 of 81, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Fagan, C. P. B. (1992). Keeping families together: The homebuilders model. Child Welfare, 71(3), 283-285.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Floyd, R. M., & Taylor, J. (1991). Keeping families together: The homebuilders model. Community Alternatives, 3(2), 145-147.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Forsythe, P. (1992). Homebuilders and family preservation. Children and Youth Services Review, 14(1-2), 37-47.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M., & Haapla, D. (1987). Home-based family treatment:  A quantitative-qualitative assessment. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 12(1), 1-23.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M., Pecora, P. J., & Haapla, D. A. (1991). Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family peservation services. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design; Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M. W., Pecora, P. J., Popuang, C., & Haapala, D. A. (1992). Event history analysis: A proportional hazards perspective on modeling outcomes in intensive family preservation services. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1-2), 123-158.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Gentry, S. V., Powers, E. F. J., Azim, N., & Maidrag, M. (2018). Effectiveness of a voluntary family befriending service: A mixed methods evaluation using the Donabedian model. Public Health, 160, 87–93.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Gibbons, J., & Thorpe, S. (1989). Can voluntary support projects help vulnerable families? The work of home-start. British Journal of Social Work, 19(3), 189-202.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Outside search years

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Hann, M. (2017). Engaging fathers: The next challenge for Home-Start. Journal of Health Visiting, 5(7), 334–337.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Harrison, M. (1983). The 'home-start' scheme. Midwife, Health Visitor & Community Nurse, 19(8), 328-330.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX