Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 51 - 60 of 81, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

MacPherson, K., Barnes, J., Nichols, M., & Dixon, S. (2010). Volunteer support for mothers with new babies: Perceptions of need and support received. Children & Society, 24(3), 175-187. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00227.x

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Making a difference for children and families: Home-Start social impact report 2014. (2015). Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

McAuley, C., Knapp, M., Beecham, J., McCurry, N., & Sleed, M. (2004). Young families under stress: Outcomes and costs of Home-Start support. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

McGuffin, V. (2002). Family support: Measuring the benefits to families. Child Care in Practice, 8(4), 251.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Mcrae, R. E. (2002). The treatment of child neglect through a comprehensive service strategy including home-based therapy, play therapy, parent education, and parent-child interaction therapy. (Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(08B), ISSN No. 0419-4217 (AAI3061081).

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Morris, E., Suarez, L., & Reid, J. C. (1997). Behavioral outcomes of home-based services for children and adolescents with serious emotional disorders. Family Preservation Journal, 2(2), 21-32.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Nelson, K., Landsman, M. K., Tyler, M., & Richardson, B. (1996). Length of service & cost-effectiveness in three intensive family service programs: Final report. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program; Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Oakley, A., Rajan, L., & Turner, H. (1998). Evaluating parent support initiatives: Lessons from two case studies. Health & Social Care in the Community, 6(5), 318-330.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smallegange, E. S., Hermanns, J., & Oort, F. J. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of Home-Start support in Dutch families. Journal of Social Work, 19(3), 327-350.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Spaid, W. M., & Fraser, M. (1991). The correlates of Success/Failure in brief and intensive family treatment: Implications for family preservation services. Children and Youth Services Review, 13(1-2), 77-99.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download