Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 21 - 30 of 49, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Hermanns, J. M., Asscher, J. J., Zijlstra, B. J., Hoffenaar, P. J., & Dekovič, M. (2013). Long-term changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(4), 678–684.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Home is where we start from. (2021). Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Johnson, S. A. (1998). Comparison of variables affecting pregnancy outcomes of younger and older teens in a resource mom program. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati).(UMI Order AAI9904073.). (2004134028)

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Jones, C. C., Hayter, M., & Jomeen, J. (2015). A Home-Start peer support scheme for women with low mood following childbirth. Community Practitioner, 88(9), 41–44.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Julnes, G., Konefal, M., Pindur, W., & Kim, P. (1994). Community-based perinatal care for disadvantaged adolescents: Evaluation of the Resource Mothers Program. Journal of Community Health, 19(1), 41–53.

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Kenkre, J., & Young, E. (2014). Building resilience: Volunteer support for families with complex circumstances and needs. [Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE].

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Konefal, M. M. (1991). Norfolk Resource Mothers Program evaluation (adolescent pregnancy, Virginia). (Doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University, 1991); 0418 Adviser: Director: Wolfgang Pindur. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52 (06A), 261-2267. (AAG9130678)

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

MacPherson, K., Barnes, J., Nichols, M., & Dixon, S. (2010). Volunteer support for mothers with new babies: Perceptions of need and support received. Children & Society, 24(3), 175-187. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00227.x

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Making a difference for children and families: Home-Start social impact report 2014. (2015). Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

McAuley, C., Knapp, M., Beecham, J., McCurry, N., & Sleed, M. (2004). Young families under stress: Outcomes and costs of Home-Start support. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download