Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 191 - 200 of 327, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Prinsen, B. (1997). Community-based support programs and primary prevention. Paper presented at the ISPCAN Conference on Child Abuse, Barcelona, Spain.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2009). Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P System population trial. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 10(1), 1-12.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2016). Addendum: “Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P system population trial.” Prevention Science, 17(3), 410–416.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2015). Erratum: “Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The US Triple P system population trial.” Prevention Science, 16(1), 168.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2015). Erratum: “Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The US Triple P system population trial.” Prevention Science, 16(1), 168.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2016). Addendum: “Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P system population trial.” Prevention Science, 17(3), 410–416.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Proctor, K. B., & Brestan-Knight, E. (2016). Evaluating the use of assessment paradigms for preventive interventions: A review of the Triple P—Positive Parenting Program. Children and Youth Services Review, 62, 72–82.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Rahmqvist, J., Wells, M. B., & Sarkadi, A. (2014). Conscious parenting: a qualitative study on Swedish parents’ motives to participate in a parenting program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(5), 934–944.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ralph, A., & Sanders, M. (2006). The ‘teen Triple P’ Positive Parenting Program: a preliminary evaluation. Youth Studies Australia, 25(2), 41-48.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ramaekers, S., & Vandezande, A. (2013). ‘Parents need to become independent problem solvers’: a critical reading of the current parenting culture through the case of Triple P. Ethics and Education, 8(1), 77–88.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download