Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 18, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Bavolek, S. J. (2000). The Nurturing Parenting Programs. Family strengthening series. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Report No. NCJ-172848

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Bavolek, S. J. (2002). Research and validation report of the Nurturing Parenting Programs. Research report. Asheville, NC: Family Development Resources, Inc.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Bavolek, S., Keene, R., & Weikert P. (2004). The Florida study: A comparative examination of the effectiveness of the Nurturing Parenting Programs (Final report). Tallahassee: Florida Department of Children and Families.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Carta, J. J., Lefever, J. B., Bigelow, K., Borkowski, J., & Warren, S. F. (2013). Randomized trial of a cellular-phone enhanced home visitation parenting intervention. [Study 1: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module]. Pediatrics, 132(2), S167–S173. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1021Q

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Carta, J. J., Lefever, J. B., Bigelow, K., Borkowski, J., & Warren, S. F. (2013). Randomized trial of a cellular-phone enhanced home visitation parenting intervention. [Study 2: Cellular Phone-Enhanced Version of SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module]. Pediatrics, 132(2), S167–S173. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1021Q

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Cowen, P. S. (2001). Effectiveness of a parent education intervention for at-risk families. Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses, 6(2), 73-82.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Devall, E. L. (2004). Positive parenting for high-risk families. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 96(4), 22–28.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Green, J., Charman, T., Pickles, A., Wan, M. W., Elsabbagh, M., Slonims, V., . . . Jones, E. J. (2015). Parent-mediated intervention versus no intervention for infants at high risk of autism: A parallel, single-blind, randomized trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(2), 133–140.

Model(s) Reviewed: British Autism Study of Infant Siblings–Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (iBASIS–VIPP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Lefever, J. E. B., Bigelow, K. M., Carta, J. J., Borkowski, J. G., Grandfield, E., McCune, L., Irvin, D. W., & Warren, S. F. (2017). Long-term impact of a cell phone-enhanced parenting intervention. [Study 1: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module]. Child Maltreatment, 22(4), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559517723125

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Lefever, J. E. B., Bigelow, K. M., Carta, J. J., Borkowski, J. G., Grandfield, E., McCune, L., Irvin, D. W., & Warren, S. F. (2017). Long-term impact of a cell phone-enhanced parenting intervention. [Study 2: Cellular Phone-Enhanced Version of SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module]. Child Maltreatment, 22(4), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559517723125

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download