Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Barnet, B., Liu, J., DeVoe, M., Duggan, A. K., Gold, M. A., & Pecukonis, E. (2009). Motivational intervention to reduce rapid subsequent births to adolescent mothers: A community-based randomized trial. Annals of Family Medicine, 7(5), 436-445. doi:10.1370/afm.1014

Model(s) Reviewed: Computer-Assisted Motivational Intervention (CAMI)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barnet, B., Rapp, T., DeVoe, M., & Mullins, C. D. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of a motivational intervention to reduce rapid repeated childbearing in high-risk adolescent mothers: A rebirth of economic and policy considerations. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 164(4), 370-376.

Model(s) Reviewed: Computer-Assisted Motivational Intervention plus enhanced home visiting (CAMI+), Computer-Assisted Motivational Intervention (CAMI)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Brickhouse, T.H., Haldiman, R.R., & Evani, B. (2013). The impact of a home visiting program on children’s utilization of dental services. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2) S147–S152. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021N 

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Deater-Deckard, K., & Haldiman, R.R. (n.d.). Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) home-visiting asthma case management program: Preliminary results. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Holmberg, John; Luckey, Dennis; Olds, David. (2011) Teacher data for the Denver Year-9 follow-up. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Miller, Ted R., Olds, David, Knudtson, Michael, Luckey, Dennis, Bondy, Jessica, & Stevenson, Amanda. (2011) Return on investment: Nurse and paraprofessional home visitation, Denver. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Olds, D. L., Holmberg, J. R., Donelan-McCall, N., Luckey, D. W., Knudtson, M. D., & Robinson, J. (2014). Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses on children follow-up of a randomized trial at ages 6 and 9 years. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(2), 114-121.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Olds, D. L., Robinson, J., O’Brien, R., Luckey, D. W., Pettitt, L. M., Henderson, C. R., et al. (2002). Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics, 110(3), 486.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Olds, D. L., Robinson, J., Pettitt, L., Luckey, D. W., Holmberg, J., Ng, R. K., et al. (2004). Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses: Age 4 follow-up results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 114(6), 1560-1568.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shin, S.H. & Choi, C. (2023). Improving birth outcomes among low-income families: The effect of a home visiting intervention. Clinical Pediatrics, 62(11), 1375–1379. doi: 10.1177/00099228231158367

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download