Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 101 - 110 of 323, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2017). Addendum: “Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of triple P group for parent and child outcomes.” Prevention Science, 18(4), 491–503.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2017). Addendum: “Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of triple P group for parent and child outcomes.” Prevention Science, 18(4), 491–503.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hernandez Acton, E., Kubiniec, E., Bhargava, S., Tauriello, S., Paul, I. M., Savage, J. S., & Anzman-Frasca, S. (2025). INSIGHT responsive parenting intervention effects on child self-regulation at ages 3 and 6 years. Developmental Psychology, 61(8), 1413-1426. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001839

Model(s) Reviewed: Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Hernandez, E., Hohman, E. E., Ferrante, M. J., Anzman‐Frasca, S., Paul, I. M., & Savage, J. S. (2024). Toddler dietary patterns from the INSIGHT randomized clinical trial comparing responsive parenting versus control: A latent class analysis. Obesity, 32(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23900

Model(s) Reviewed: Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Hinton, S., Sheffield, J., Sanders, M. R., & Sofronoff, K. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of a telehealth parenting intervention: A mixed-disability trial. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 65, 74–85.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hoath, F. E., & Sanders, M. R. (2002). A feasibility study of Enhanced Group Triple P—Positive Parenting Program for parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behaviour Change, 19(04), 191-206.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hodge, L. M., Turner, K. M., Sanders, M. R., & Forster, M. (2017). Factors that influence evidence-based program sustainment for family support providers in child protection services in disadvantaged communities. Child Abuse & Neglect, 70, 134–145.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hopman, M., De Winter, M., & Koops, W. (2013). Values and youth care interventions: The case of Triple P. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1526–1544.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ionutiu, R. D. (2016). The effectiveness of a positive parenting program-results of a preliminary study in a Romanian sample. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament, 20(3).

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Iskander, J. M., Rakestraw, H. M., Morris, A. T., Wildman, B. G., & Duby, J. C. (2018). Group Triple P and child unintentional injury risk: A pilot study. Children’s Health Care, 47(4), 452–466.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX