Research Database

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Displaying 211 - 220 of 322
Love, S. M., Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M., Maurange, M., Knott, T., Prinz, R., . . . Ainsworth, A. T. (2016). Social media and gamification: Engaging vulnerable parents in an online evidence-based parenting program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 95–107.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Macdonald, W. (2014). The role of positive emotions within parenting interventions as part of therapeutic change (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester). Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.603175

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Marryat, L., Thompson, L., & Wilson, P. (2017). No evidence of whole population mental health impact of the Triple P parenting programme: Findings from a routine dataset. BMC Pediatrics, 17(1), 40.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Mejia, A., Calam, R., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Examining the fit of evidence-based parenting programs in low-resource settings: A survey of practitioners in Panama. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(8), 2262–2269.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Morawska, A., Mitchell, A. E., Burgess, S., & Fraser, J. (2017). Corrigendum: “Effects of Triple P parenting intervention on child health outcomes for childhood asthma and eczema: Randomised controlled trial.” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 83, 35–44.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Morawska, A., Mitchell, A. E., Burgess, S., & Fraser, J. (2017). Fathers’ perceptions of change following parenting intervention: Randomized controlled trial of Triple P for parents of children with asthma or eczema. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 42(7), 792–803.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Morawska, A., Mitchell, A. E., Burgess, S., & Fraser, J. (2016). Effects of Triple P parenting intervention on child health outcomes for childhood asthma and eczema: Randomised controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 83, 35–44.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Morawska, A., Mitchell, A. E., Burgess, S., & Fraser, J. (2016). Effects of Triple P parenting intervention on child health outcomes for childhood asthma and eczema: Randomised controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 83, 35–44.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens