Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 41 - 50 of 71, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Maher, E. J., Kelly, J. F., & Scarpa, J. P. (2008). A qualitative evaluation of a program to support family, friend, and neighbor caregivers. NHSA DIALOG, 11(2), 69–89.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Maldonado Barsse, D. P. (2023). Cross-sectional associations between anthropometric measures (BMI z-score, waist circumference, waist-to-height-ratio) and cardiometabolic risk factors, among young children in the Guelph Family Health Study. Master’s thesis, University of Guelph. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/cbc04bf6-3e66…

Model(s) Reviewed: Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible grey literature

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Mirotta, J. A., Darlington, G. A., Buchholz, A. C., Haines, J., Ma, D. W. L., & Duncan, A. M. (2018). Guelph Family Health Study’s home-based obesity prevention intervention increases fibre and fruit intake in preschool-aged children [Study 1: Four home visits]. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice & Research, 79(2), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2017-036

Model(s) Reviewed: Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Mirotta, J. A., Darlington, G. A., Buchholz, A. C., Haines, J., Ma, D. W. L., & Duncan, A. M. (2018). Guelph Family Health Study’s home-based obesity prevention intervention increases fibre and fruit intake in preschool-aged children [Study 2: Two home visits]. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research, 79(2), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2017-036

Model(s) Reviewed: Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Nelson, E. M., & Spieker, S. J. (2013). Intervention effects on morning and stimulated cortisol responses among toddlers in foster care. Infant Mental Health Journal, 34(3), 211-221.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Oxford, M., Abrahamson‐Richards, T., O'Leary, R., Booth‐LaForce, C., Spieker, S., Lohr, M. J., ... & Kelly, J. (2024). The development of the Promoting First Relationships home visiting program and caregivers’ comments about their experiences across four RCT studies. Infant Mental Health Journal. 46(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.22153

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Oxford, M., Booth-LaForce, C., Echo-Hawk, A., Lallemand, O., Parrish, L., Widner, M., Petras, A., . . . the CATCH Project Team. (2018). Promoting First Relationships®: Implementing a home visiting research program in two tribal communities. Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Oxford, M., Booth-LaForce, C., Echo-Hawk, A., Madesclaire, O., Parrish, L., Widner, M., Petras, A., Abrahamson-Richards, T., Nelson, K., Buchwald, D., & CATCH Project Team. (2020). Promoting First Relationships®: Implementing a home visiting research program in two American Indian communities. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562120914424

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Oxford, M. L., Fleming, C. B., Nelson, E. M., Kelly, J. F., & Spieker, S. J. (2013). Randomized Trial of Promoting First Relationships: Effects on maltreated toddlers' separation distress and sleep regulation after reunification. Children & Youth Services Review, 35, 1988-1992

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®

View Manuscript
On hold
Exclusively reports on subgroup findings, pending replication

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Oxford, M. L., Hash, J.B., Lohr, M. J., Fleming, C. B., Dow-Smith, C., & Spieker, S. J. (2023). What works for whom? Mother’s psychological distress as a moderator of the effectiveness of a home visiting intervention. Infant Mental Health Journal, 44(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.22050

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download XLSX