Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 21 - 30 of 2059, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Aldrich, H., & Gance-Cleveland, B. (2016). Comparing weight-for-length status of young children in two infant feeding programs. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 20(12), 2518–2526.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Aldrich, H., & Gance-Cleveland, B. (2018). Comparing weight-for-length status of young children in two infant feeding programs. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(12), 2518–2526.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study is not the most recent and complete version available

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Allen, L., Sethi, A., & Astuto, J. (2007). An evaluation of graduates of a toddlerhood home visiting program at kindergarten age. NHSA Dialog: A Research-to-Practice Journal for the Early Intervention Field, 10(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240750701301811

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Alsancak-Akbulut, C., Sahin-Acar, B., & Sumer, N. (2020). Effect of video-feedback intervention on turkish mothers' sensitivity and physical intrusiveness: A randomized control trial. Attachment & Human Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2020.1753085

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Altfeld, S. (2002). The Chicago Doula Project evaluation final report. Chicago, IL: The Ounce of Prevention Fund.

Model(s) Reviewed: HealthConnect One's® Community-Based Doula Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Alyousefi-van Dijk K., de Waal, N., van IJzendoorn M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J. (2021). Development and feasibility of the prenatal video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for expectant fathers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1–14.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program 

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Ambrose, T., Walton, K., Annis, A., Buchholz, A., & Haines, J. (2017). Putting family in Guelph Family Health Study. Guelph, Canada: University of Guelph. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/e3435089-54ed…

Model(s) Reviewed: Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Not a manuscript

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Amm, R., & Juan, S. (1994). A parent education success story: The Parents as Teachers program in the US and Australia. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 19(2), 10-15.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ammerman, R. T., Peugh, J. L., Jones, D. E., Van Ginkel, J. B., & Feinberg, M. E. (2019). Promoting co-parenting in home-visiting: A CACE analysis of the Family Foundations program. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ammerman, R. T., Peugh, J. L., Putnam, F. W., & Van Ginkel, J. B. (2012). Predictors of treatment response in depressed mothers receiving in-home cognitive-behavioral therapy and concurrent home visiting. Behavior Modification, 36(4), 462-481.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX