Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 241 - 250 of 266, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Thompson-Grubham, T. (2014). Home-visitation and parent education: The impact on home-based shared reading during kindergarten (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University).

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Thorland, W., & Currie, D. (2017). Status of birth outcomes in clients of the Nurse-Family Partnership. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 21(5), 995–1001.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Thorland, W., Currie, D., Wiegand, E., Walsh, J., & Mader, N. (2017). Status of breastfeeding and child immunization outcomes in clients of the Nurse-Family Partnership. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 21(3), 439–445.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Tombari, M. (2008). Colorado HIPPY evaluation — 2008 study 1: Progression of learning (skills taught at specific intervals in the HIPPY curriculum). Denver, CO: Partnership for Families and Children.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a single-case design study that does not satisfy all ratings determinants or there are an insufficient number of phases and/or assessments per phase.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Tombari, M. (2008). Colorado HIPPY evaluation — 2008 study 3: Parent knowledge. Denver, CO: Partnership for Families and Children.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Tsivos, Z. L., Calam, R., Sanders, M. R., & Wittkowski, A. (2015). A pilot randomised controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Programme in mothers with postnatal depression. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20(4), 532–554.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Unger, D. G., & Wandersman, L. P. (1985). Social support and adolescent mothers: Action research contributions to theory and application. The Journal of Social Issues, 41(1), 29-45.

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Urbano, R. C., Beck, C., & Stephens, J. (2013). Linking datasets. A practical guide to research using secondary analysis. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 45, 35-121. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407760-7.00002-5

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Valadez, E. A., Tottenham, N., Korom, M., Tabachnick, A. R., Pine, D. S., & Dozier, M. (2024). A randomized controlled trial of a parenting intervention during infancy alters amygdala-prefrontal circuitry in middle childhood. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 63(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2023.06.015 [Study 1: Randomized controlled trial].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Valadez, E. A., Tottenham, N., Korom, M., Tabachnick, A. R., Pine, D. S., & Dozier, M. (2024). A randomized controlled trial of a parenting intervention during infancy alters amygdala-prefrontal circuitry in middle childhood. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 63(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2023.06.015 [Study 2: Non-experimental design].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download