Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, read about our Systematic Review Handbook of Procedures and Evidence Standards.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Search By

Displaying 2191 - 2200 of 2490
PFL Evaluation Team at the UCD Geary Institute. (2011). Report on children’s profile at school entry 2008-2011: Evaluation of the ‘Preparing For Life’ early childhood intervention programme. Dublin, Ireland: UCD Geary Institute.

Model(s) Reviewed: Preparing for Life—Home Visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
PFL Evaluation Team at the UCD Geary Institute. (2014). Preparing For Life: Early childhood intervention: Assessing the impact of Preparing For Life at thirty-six months. Dublin, Ireland: UCD Geary Institute.

Model(s) Reviewed: Preparing for Life—Home Visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
PFL Evaluation Team at the UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy. (2015). Preparing For Life: Early childhood intervention: Assessing the impact of Preparing For Life at forty-eight months. Dublin, Ireland: UCD Geary Institute.

Model(s) Reviewed: Preparing for Life—Home Visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
PFL Evaluation Team at the UCD Geary Institute. (2011). Preparing for Life early childhood intervention: Assessing the early impact of Preparing for Life at six months. Dublin, Ireland: UCD Geary Institute.

Model(s) Reviewed: Preparing for Life—Home Visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
PFL Evaluation Team at the UCD Geary Institute. (2016). Preparing For Life early childhood intervention final report: Did Preparing For Life improve children's school readiness? Dublin, Ireland: UCD Geary Institute.

Model(s) Reviewed: Preparing for Life—Home Visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Tatlow-Golden, M., O’Farrelly, C., Booth, A., & Doyle, O. (2017). “Bursting” to go and other experiences: Children’s views on using the toilet in the first school year. The Journal of School Nursing, 33(3), 214–222.

Model(s) Reviewed: Preparing for Life—Home Visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Tatlow-Golden, M., O’Farrelly, C., Booth, A., O’Rourke, C., & Doyle, O. (2016). ‘Look, I have my ears open’: Resilience and early school experiences among children in an economically deprived suburban area in Ireland. School Psychology International, 37(2), 104–120.

Model(s) Reviewed: Preparing for Life—Home Visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens

Goldfeld, S., Price, A., & Kemp, L. (2018). Designing, testing, and implementing a sustainable nurse home visiting program: Right@ home. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1419(1), 141–159.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Kanda, K., Blythe, S., Grace, R., Elcombe, E., & Kemp, L. (2022). Variations in sustained home visiting care for mothers and children experiencing adversity. Public Health Nursing, 39(1), 71–81.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Kardamanidis, K., Kemp, L., & Schmied, V. (2009). Uncovering psychosocial needs: Perspectives of Australian child and family health nurses in a sustained home visiting trial. Contemporary Nurse, 33(1), 50–58.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study