Bergström, M., Gebreslassie, M., Hedqvist, M., Lindberg, L., Sarkadi, A., & Hjern, A. (2020). Narrative review of interventions suitable for well‐baby clinics to promote infant attachment security and parents’ sensitivity. Acta Paediatrica, 109(9), 1745–1757.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Casonato, M., Nazzari, S., & Frigerio, A. (2017). Feasibility and efficacy of an attachment-based intervention in a maltreatment sample in residential care: A pilot study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(4), 561–571.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Casonato, M., Nazzari, S., & Frigerio, A. (2017). Feasibility and efficacy of an attachment-based intervention in a maltreatment sample in residential care: A pilot study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(4), 561–571.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Low
ClinicalTrials.gov. National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2017).
Efficacy of family programs for improving child and family health and development. Study description. Identifier NCT03367845. Retrieved April 26, 2019 from:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/nct03367845.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Comyn, J. (2019). Exploring stakeholders' perceptions of the impact, acceptability and feasibility of a video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting in foster care (VIPP-FC) (Publication No. 2467443133) [Doctoral thesis, University College London (United Kingdom]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Donato, S., & Bertoni, A. (2017). Positive parenting as responsible care: Risks, protective factors, and intervention evaluation. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 45(3), 151–155.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Euser, S., Vrijhof, C. I., Van den Bulk, B. G, Vermeulen, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2021). Video-feedback promotes sensitive limit-setting in parents of twin preschoolers: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 1–14.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Groeneveld, M. G., Vermeer, H. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Linting, M. (2011). Enhancing home-based child care quality through video-feedback intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(1), 86.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Hodes, M. W., Meppelder, H. M., Schuengel, C., & Kef, S. (2014). Tailoring a video-feedback intervention for sensitive discipline to parents with intellectual disabilities: A process evaluation. Attachment & Human Development, 16(4), 387–401.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Iles, J. E., Rosan, C., Wilkinson, E., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2017). Adapting and developing a video-feedback intervention for co-parents of infants at risk of externalising behaviour problems (VIPP-Co): A feasibility study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(3), 483–499.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens