Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 31 - 40 of 45, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Roggman, L., Boyce, L. K., & Cook, G. (2009). Keeping kids on track: Impacts of a parenting-focused Early Head Start program on attachment security and cognitive development. Early Education & Development, 20(6) 920-941

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Roggman, L. A., & Cook, G. A. (2010). Attachment, aggression, and family risk in a low-income sample. Family Science, 1(3), 191-204. doi:10.1080/19424620.2010.567829

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shapiro, C. J., Kilburn, J., & Hardin, J. W. (2014b). Prevention of behavior problems in a selected population: Stepping Stones Triple P for parents of young children with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(11), 2958–2975. (Study Two)

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Home Visiting: Standard Stepping Stones

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Silovsky, J. F., Bard, D., Chaffin, M., Hecht, D., Burris, L., Owora, A., Beasley, L., Doughty, D., & Lutzker, J. (2011). Prevention of child maltreatment in high-risk rural families: A randomized clinical trial with child welfare outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(8), 1435–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.023

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Silovsky, J., Bard, D., Owora, A. H., Milojevich, H., Jorgensen, A., , Hecht, D. (2022). Risk and protective factors associated with adverse childhood experiences in vulnerable families, results of a randomized clinical trial of SafeCare®. Child Maltreatment, 28(2), 384-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595221100723

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Spieker, S. J., Oxford, M. L., & Fleming, C. B. (2014). Permanency outcomes for toddlers in child welfare two years after a randomized trial of a parenting intervention. Children & Youth Services Review, 44, 201-206.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Spieker, S. J., Oxford, M. L., Kelly, J. F., Nelson, E. M., & Fleming, C. B. (2012). Promoting First Relationships: Randomized trial of a relationship-based intervention for toddlers in child welfare. Child Maltreatment, 17(4), 271-286.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Vogel, C. A., Xue, Y., Moiduddin, E. M., Kisker, E. E., & Carlson, B. L. (2010). Early Head Start children in grade 5: Long-term follow-up of the Early Head Start research and evaluation study sample (OPRE Report #2011-8). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/grade5.pdf

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Wagner, M., & Spiker, D. (2001). Experiences and outcomes for children and families: Multisite Parents as Teachers evaluation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. http://www.sri.com/policy/cehs/publications/humanpub/patfinal.pdf.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Whitehouse, A. J., Varcin, K. J., Pillar, S., Billingham, W., Alvares, G. A., Barbaro, J., ... & Hudry, K. (2021). Effect of preemptive intervention on developmental outcomes among infants showing early signs of autism: a randomized clinical trial of outcomes to diagnosis. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(11), e213298-e213298.

Model(s) Reviewed: British Autism Study of Infant Siblings–Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (iBASIS–VIPP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download