Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 21, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Lunkenheimer, E. S., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Connell, A. M., Gardner, F., Wilson, M. N., & Skuban, E. M. (2008). Collateral benefits of the family check-up on early childhood school readiness: Indirect effects of parents’ positive behavior support. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1737–1752.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Michalopoulos, C., Faucetta, K., Hill, C. J., Portilla, X., Burrell, L., Lee, H., Duggan, A., & Knox, V. (2019). Impacts on family outcomes of evidence-based early childhood home visiting: Results from the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (OPRE Report 2019-07). [Study 4-PAT contrast]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/mihope_impac…

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Moilanen, K. L., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. (2010). Predictors of longitudinal growth in inhibitory control in early childhood. Social Development, 19(2), 326–347.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Negrão, M., Pereira, M., Soares, I., & Mesman, J. (2014). Enhancing positive parent-child interactions and family functioning in a poverty sample: A randomized control trial. Attachment & Human Development, 16(4), 315-328.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Oxford, M. L., Spieker, S. J., Lohr, M. J., & Fleming, C. B. (2016). Promoting First Relationships®: Randomized trial of a 10-week home visiting program with families referred to child protective services. Child Maltreatment, 21(4), 267–277.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Poslawsky, I. E., Naber, F. B., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van Daalen, E., van Engeland, H., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2015). Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting adapted to Autism (VIPP-AUTI): A randomized controlled trial. Autism, 19(5), 588–603.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting adapted to Autism (VIPP–AUTI)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Shaw, D. S., Connell, A., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2009). Improvements in maternal depression as a mediator of intervention effects on early childhood problem behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 417–439.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Supplee, L., Gardner, F., & Arnds, K. (2006). Randomized trial of a family-centered approach to the prevention of early conduct problems: 2-year effects of the family check-up in early childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(1), 1–9.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Sitnick, S. L., Shaw, D. S., Gill, A., Dishion, T., Winter, C., Waller, R., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. (2015). Parenting and the family check-up: Changes in observed parent-child interaction following early childhood intervention. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(6), 970–984.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Wilson, M. N., Winter, C. C., & Patterson, G. R. (2014). Coercive family process and early-onset conduct problems from age 2 to school entry. Development and Psychopathology, 26(4 Pt. 1), 917.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download