Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 7 of 7, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Brickhouse, T.H., Haldiman, R.R., & Evani, B. (2013). The impact of a home visiting program on children’s utilization of dental services. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2) S147–S152. https://doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021N

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Deater-Deckard, K., & Haldiman, R.R. (n.d.). Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) home-visiting asthma case management program: Preliminary results. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Dugravier, R., Tubach, F., Saias, T., Guedeney, N., Pasquet, B., Purper-Ouakil, D., . . . Greacen, T. (2013). Impact of a manualized multifocal perinatal home-visiting program using psychologists on postnatal depression: The CAPEDP randomized controlled trial. PloS One, 8(8), e72216.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Foulon, S., Greacen, T., Pasquet, B., Dugravier, R., Saïas, T., Guedeney, N., . . . CAPEDP Study Group. (2015). Predictors of study attrition in a randomized controlled trial evaluating a perinatal home-visiting program with mothers with psychosocial vulnerabilities. PloS One, 10(11), e0142495.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Saïas, T., Greacen, T., Tubach, F., Dugravier, R., Marcault, E., Tereno, S., . . . CAPEDP Study Group. (2013). Supporting families in challenging contexts: The CAPEDP project. Global Health Promotion, 20(2), 66–70.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Saïas, T., Lerner, E., Greacen, T., Simon-Vernier, E., Emer, A., Pintaux, E., . . . Revah-Levy, A. (2012). Evaluating fidelity in home-visiting programs a qualitative analysis of 1058 home visit case notes from 105 families. PloS One, 7(5), e36915.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shin, S.H. & Choi, C. (2023). Improving birth outcomes among low-income families: The effect of a home visiting intervention. Clinical Pediatrics, 62(11), 1375–1379. https://doi:10.1177/00099228231158367

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download