Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 15, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Barth, R. P. (1989). Evaluation of a task-centered child abuse prevention program. Children and Youth Services Review, 11(2), 117-131.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P. (1991). An experimental evaluation of in-home child abuse prevention services. Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 15(4), 363-75.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P., Ash, J. R., & Hacking, S. (1986). Identifying, screening and engaging high-risk clients in private nonprofit child-abuse prevention programs. Child Abuse and Neglect, 10(1), 99-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P., Hacking, S., & Ash, J. R. (1988). Preventing child abuse: An experimental evaluation of the Child Parent Enrichment Project. Journal of Primary Prevention, 8(4), 201-217.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Brickhouse, T.H., Haldiman, R.R., & Evani, B. (2013). The impact of a home visiting program on children’s utilization of dental services. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2) S147–S152. https://doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021N

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Caron, E., Kipp, E. C., Costello, A. H., Bernard, K., Schein, S. S., Roben, C. K. P., & Dozier, M. (2022). Parent coaching fidelity trajectories of in-person and telehealth sessions during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(3), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2021.1996300

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant), Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Deater-Deckard, K., & Haldiman, R.R. (n.d.). Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) home-visiting asthma case management program: Preliminary results. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Gaudreau, C., Delgado, A., Confair-Jones, R., Flambaum, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Raby, K. L., Dozier, M., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2024). The unanticipated side effects of an attachment intervention: Parents ask higher quality questions. Developmental Psychology, 60(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001707

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Labella, M. H., Raby, K. L., Bourne, S. V., Trahan, A. C., Katz, D., & Dozier, M. (2024). Is Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up effective for parents with insecure attachment states of mind? Child Development, 95(2), 648-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14002

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant), Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible comparison

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Liming, K. W., Grube, W., Lloyd Sieger, M. H., Brook, J., Berryhill, E., Akin, B. A., & Mendenhall, A. (2024). Child Welfare Outcomes After Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up Intervention Participation: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Child Maltreatment, 30(2), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595241265968 [Study 3: ABC – Early Childhood contrast].
 

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download XLSX