Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 51 - 60 of 106, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Kirk, R. S., Reed-Ashcraft, K., & Pecora, P. J. (2002). Implementing intensive family preservation services: A case of infidelity. Family Preservation Journal, 6(2), 59-81.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Koomson, W. K. (2006). Adult learner participation and outcome: A comparison study between the community ABE/GED program and Family Literacy program in two countries. Do different strategies yield different results? (Pennsylvania; United Kingdom). (Pennsylvania State University; 0176 Advisor: Eunice Askov). Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (08A), 219-2847. (AAI3229418)

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Landerholm, E. (1998). Computers in Even Start. School Community Journal, 8(1), 31-41.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Landerholm, E. (1999). Integration of old and new technology: Computers, photography, and video technology in an Even Start Family Literacy project. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Office of Education.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Landerholm, E. (1999). Integration of old and new technology in an Even Start program. School Community Journal, 9(2), 85–97.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Landerholm, E., Karr, J., & Mushi, S. (2000). A collaborative approach to family literacy evaluation strategies. Early Child Development and Care, 162, 65–79.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Levin, M., Gamse, B., Swartz, J., Tao, F., & Tarr, H. (1997). National evaluation of the Even Start Family Literacy program: Report on migrant Even Start projects. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates and Fu Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Levin, M., Moss, M., Swartz, J., Khan, S., & Tarr, H. (1997). National evaluation of the Even Start Family Literacy program: Report on Even Start projects for Indian tribes and tribal organizations. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates and Fu Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, R. E. (1990). Service-related correlates of treatment success in intensive family preservation services for child welfare. (University of Utah; 0240 Advisor: Chairman: Peter J. Pecora). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (03A), 248-1003. (AAG9025368)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, R. E. (1994). Application and adaptation of intensive family preservation services to use for  the reunification of foster-children with their biological parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(5-6), 339-361.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download