Research Manuscript Database
Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.
Search By
Walton, E., & Dodini, A. C. (1999). Intensive in-home family-based services: Reactions from consumers and providers. Family Preservation Journal, 4(2), 39–51.
Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Wells, K. (1994). A reorientation to knowledge development in family preservation services: A proposal. Child Welfare, 73(5), 475-488.
Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Wells, K., & Wittington, D. Child and family functioning after intensive family preservation services. Social Service Review, 67(1), 55-83.
Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Welsh, M. (2021). A pilot randomised controlled trial of Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting (VIPP) for parents experiencing difficulties consistent with Personality Disorder: what are the effects on sensitive and non-intrusive parenting? [Doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey].
Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Westat, Chapin Hall Center for Children, & James Bell Associates (2002). Evaluation of family preservation and reunification programs: Final report. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Whittaker, J. K., Tracy, E. M., Kinney, J., & Booth, C. (1990). Reaching high-risk families: Intensive family preservation in human services. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Williams, O. (2017). Healthy Start, Happy Start: Fathers’ experiences and engagement in an attachment-based parenting intervention (Doctoral dissertation, University College London). Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746891
Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Wójtowicz-Dacka, M., & Miotk-Mrozowska, M. (2016). Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline as a new psychological method of development support in Poland. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47(3), 250–257.
Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Yagmur, S., Mesman, J., Malda, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M., & Ekmekci, H. (2014). Video-feedback intervention increases sensitive parenting in ethnic minority mothers: A randomized control trial. Attachment & Human Development, 16(4), 371-386. doi:10.1080/14616734.2014.912489
Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Zeanah, C. H., Berlin, L. J., & Boris, N. W. (2011). Practitioner review: Clinical applications of attachment theory and research for infants and young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(8), 819–833.
Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant), Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)