Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 9 of 9, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Anderson, A. K. (2005). Impact of peer counseling on exclusive breastfeeding: A randomized controlled trial (Publication No. 305015882)[Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/impact-peer-counseling-on…

Model(s) Reviewed: Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible grey literature

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Anderson, A. K., Damio, G., Young, S., Chapman, D. J., & Perez-Escamilla, R. (2005). A randomized trial assessing the efficacy of peer counseling on exclusive breastfeeding in a predominantly Latina low-income community. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(9), 836–841. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.9.836

Model(s) Reviewed: Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Brickhouse, T.H., Haldiman, R.R., & Evani, B. (2013). The impact of a home visiting program on children’s utilization of dental services. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2) S147–S152. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021N 

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Chapman, D. J., Damio, G., Young, S., & Perez-Escamilla, R. (2004). Effectiveness of breastfeeding peer counseling in a low-income, predominantly Latina population: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158(9), 897-902. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.158.9.897

Model(s) Reviewed: Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Deater-Deckard, K., & Haldiman, R.R. (n.d.). Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) home-visiting asthma case management program: Preliminary results. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Llewellyn, G., McConnell, D., Honey, A., Mayes, R., & Russo, D. (2003). Promoting health and home safety for children of parents with intellectual disability: A randomized controlled trial. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24(6), 405-431.

Model(s) Reviewed: Australian adaptation of the UCLA Parent-Child Health and Wellness Project, a version of SafeCare

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Rhodes, E. C., Damio, G., LaPlant, H. W., Trymbulak, W., Crummett, C., Surprenant, R., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2021). Promoting equity in breastfeeding through peer counseling: The US Breastfeeding Heritage and Pride program. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01408-3

Model(s) Reviewed: Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Rhodes, E. C., Wilde LaPlant, H., Zahid, M., Abuwala, N., Damio, G., Crummett, C., Surprenant, R., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2022). Shifting to virtual breastfeeding counseling for low-income women in the US during COVID-19: A partner-engaged multimethod evaluation of program adaptations. Frontiers in Health Services, 2, 1020326. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1020326

Model(s) Reviewed: Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Shin, S.H. & Choi, C. (2023). Improving birth outcomes among low-income families: The effect of a home visiting intervention. Clinical Pediatrics, 62(11), 1375–1379. doi: 10.1177/00099228231158367

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download