Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 8 of 8, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Abikoff, H. B., Thompson, M., Laver‐Bradbury, C., Long, N., Forehand, R. L., Miller Brotman, L., Laver- Klein, R.G., Reiss, P., Huo, L., & Sonuga‐Barke, E. (2015). Parent training for preschool ADHD: A randomized controlled trial of specialized and generic programs. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(6), 618–631. Study 1.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Abikoff, H. B., Thompson, M., Laver‐Bradbury, C., Long, N., Forehand, R. L., Miller Brotman, L., Laver- Klein, R.G., Reiss, P., Huo, L., & Sonuga‐Barke, E. (2015). Parent training for preschool ADHD: A randomized controlled trial of specialized and generic programs. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(6), 618–631. Study 2.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Boyd, A. (1997). Parents as First Teachers pilot project evaluation (PAFT): Report on South Auckland area. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as First Teachers (New Zealand)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Livingstone, I. D. (1999). Parents as First Teachers: Supplement to the summary report of the evaluation of the pilot project: Report to the Ministry of Education. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as First Teachers (New Zealand)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Praat, A. (2011). Parents as First Teachers evaluation: Phase II report. New Zealand: Ministry of Social Development.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as First Teachers (New Zealand)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Sonuga‐Barke, E. J., Thompson, M., Daley, D., & Laver‐Bradbury, C. (2004). Parent training for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Is it as effective when delivered as routine rather than as specialist care? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 449–457.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797–809. Study 2.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797-809. Study 1. 

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1
Download XLSX