Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 91 - 100 of 334, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Greacen, T., Welniarz, B., Purper‐ouakil, D., Wendland, J., Dugravier, R., Saïas, T., . . . Capedp Study Group. (2017). Best practice in individual supervision of psychologists working in the French CAPEDP preventive perinatal home visiting program: Results of a Delphi consensus process. Infant Mental Health Journal, 38(2), 267–275.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Guédeney, N., Tereno, S., Tissier, J., Guédeney, A., Greacen, T., Saïas, T., ... & CAPEDP-A, G. (2012). Transmission du traumatisme. La question de l’attachement désorganisé: de la théorie à la pratique. Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence, 60(5), 362–366.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study is not written in English
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Guedeney, A., Wendland, J., Dugravier, R., Saïas, T., Tubach, F., Welniarz, B., . . . Pasquet, B. (2013). Impact of a randomized home‐visiting trial on infant social withdrawal in the CAPEDP prevention study. Infant Mental Health Journal, 34(6), 594–601.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Guo, M., Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of group triple P with Chinese parents in Mainland China. Behavior Modification, 40(6), 825–851.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Haggerty, K. P., McGlynn-Wright, A., & Klima, T. (2013). Promising parenting programmes for reducing adolescent problem behaviours. Journal of Children’s Services, 8(4), 229-243.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hampel, O. A., Hasmann, R., Hasmann, S. E., Holl, R. W., Karpinski, N., Boehm, R., . . . Petermann, F. (2015). Psychological care of families with developmentally retarded or disabled children. Comparison between routine treatment with or without Stepping Stones Triple P parenting group training. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 163(11), 1160–1166.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study is not written in English
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hampel, O. A., Hasmann, R., Karpinski, N., Gießelmann, L.-S., Hasmann, S. E., Hubig, C., . . . Petermann, F. (2017). Stepping Stones Triple P: Long-term effects of the Stepping-Stones-SPC-Multicentre Study. Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde, 165(6), 495–501.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study is not written in English
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hartung, D., & Hahlweg, K. (2010). Strengthening parent well-being at the work–family interface: A German trial on workplace Triple P. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(5), 404-418.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Haskett, M. E., Armstrong, J., Neal, S. C., & Aldianto, K. (2018). Perceptions of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program seminars among parents experiencing homelessness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(6), 1957–1967.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Haslam, D. M., Sanders, M. R., & Sofronoff, K. (2013). Reducing work and family conflict in teachers: A randomised controlled trial of workplace Triple P. School Mental Health, 5(2), 70-82.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download