Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 9 of 9, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Brickhouse, T.H., Haldiman, R.R., & Evani, B. (2013). The impact of a home visiting program on children’s utilization of dental services. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2) S147–S152. https://doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021N

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Deater-Deckard, K., & Haldiman, R.R. (n.d.). Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) home-visiting asthma case management program: Preliminary results. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Green, J., Charman, T., Pickles, A., Wan, M. W., Elsabbagh, M., Slonims, V., . . . Jones, E. J. (2015). Parent-mediated intervention versus no intervention for infants at high risk of autism: A parallel, single-blind, randomized trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(2), 133–140.

Model(s) Reviewed: British Autism Study of Infant Siblings–Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (iBASIS–VIPP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Shin, S.H. & Choi, C. (2023). Improving birth outcomes among low-income families: The effect of a home visiting intervention. Clinical Pediatrics, 62(11), 1375–1379. https://doi:10.1177/00099228231158367

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Taft, A., Small, R., Hegarty, K., & Lumley, J. (2004). Mosaic (Mothers’ Advocates in the Community): A randomised community intervention trial in general practice to reduce partner abuse and depression among recent mothers. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(suppl. 1), p. A56.

Model(s) Reviewed: Mothers’ Advocates in the Community (MOSAIC)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study is not the most recent and complete version available

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Taft, A. J., Small, R., Hegarty, K. L., Lumley, J., Watson, L. F., & Gold, L. (2009). MOSAIC (Mothers’ Advocates in the Community): Protocol and sample description of a cluster randomised trial of mentor mother support to reduce intimate partner violence among pregnant or recent mothers. BMC Public Health, 9(159).

Model(s) Reviewed: Mothers’ Advocates in the Community (MOSAIC)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Taft, A. J., Small, R., Hegarty, K. L., Watson, L. F., Gold, L., & Lumley, J. A. (2011). Mothers’ AdvocateS in the community (MOSAIC)- non-professional mentor support to reduce intimate partner violence and depression in mothers: A cluster randomized trial in primary care. BMC Public Health, 11(178).

Model(s) Reviewed: Mothers’ Advocates in the Community (MOSAIC)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Whitehouse, A. J., Varcin, K. J., Alvares, G. A., Barbaro, J., Bent, C., Boutrus, M., ... & Hudry, K. (2019). Pre-emptive intervention versus treatment as usual for infants showing early behavioural risk signs of autism spectrum disorder: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 3(9), 605-615.

Model(s) Reviewed: British Autism Study of Infant Siblings–Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (iBASIS–VIPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Whitehouse, A. J., Varcin, K. J., Pillar, S., Billingham, W., Alvares, G. A., Barbaro, J., ... & Hudry, K. (2021). Effect of preemptive intervention on developmental outcomes among infants showing early signs of autism: a randomized clinical trial of outcomes to diagnosis. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(11), e213298-e213298.

Model(s) Reviewed: British Autism Study of Infant Siblings–Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (iBASIS–VIPP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1
Download XLSX