Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 16, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Bigelow, K. M., & Lutzker, J. R. (2000). Training parents reported for or at risk for child abuse and neglect to identify and treat their children's illnesses. Journal of Family Violence, 15(4), 311–330.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a single-case design study that does not satisfy all ratings determinants or there are an insufficient number of phases and/or assessments per phase.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Delgado, L. E., & Lutzker, J. R. (1988). Training young parents to identify and report their children's illnesses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21(3), 311.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a single-case design study that does not satisfy all ratings determinants or there are an insufficient number of phases and/or assessments per phase.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Gaudreau, C., Delgado, A., Confair-Jones, R., Flambaum, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Raby, K. L., Dozier, M., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2024). The unanticipated side effects of an attachment intervention: Parents ask higher quality questions. Developmental Psychology, 60(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001707

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Gershater-Molko, R. M., Lutzker, J. R., & Wesch, D. (2002). Using  recidivism data to evaluate project SafeCare: Teaching bonding, safety, and health care skills to parents. Child Maltreatment, 7(3), 277-285.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Jabaley, J. J., Lutzker, J. R., Whitaker, D. J., & Self-Brown, S. (2011). Using iPhones to enhance and reduce face-to-face home safety sessions within SafeCare: An evidence-based child maltreatment prevention program. Journal of Family Violence, 26(5), 377-385.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a single-case design study that does not satisfy all ratings determinants or there are an insufficient number of phases and/or assessments per phase.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Lewis, K., Ashby, K., McKelvey, L., & Fitzgerald, S. (2023). Arkansas Family First Prevention Services ACT Evaluation. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. https://medicine.uams.edu/familymedicine/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/202…

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Liming, K. W., Grube, W., Lloyd Sieger, M. H., Brook, J., Berryhill, E., Akin, B. A., & Mendenhall, A. (2024). Child Welfare Outcomes After Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up Intervention Participation: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Child Maltreatment, 30(2), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595241265968 [Study 3: ABC – Early Childhood contrast].
 

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Lind, T., Raby, K. L., Caron, E. B., Roben, C. K., & Dozier, M. (2017). Enhancing executive functioning among toddlers in foster care with an attachment-based intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 29(2), 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579417000190 [Study 2: Non-experimental design].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Lutzker, J. R., Megson, D. A., Webb, M. E., & Dachman, R. S. (1985). Validating and training adult-child interaction skills to professionals and to parents indicated for child abuse and neglect. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2(2), 91-104.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a single-case design study that does not satisfy all ratings determinants or there are an insufficient number of phases and/or assessments per phase.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Lutzker, J. R., & Rice, J. M. (1984). Project 12-ways: Measuring outcome of a large in-home service for treatment and prevention of child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 8(4), 519-524.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX