Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 12, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Caron, E., Kipp, E. C., Costello, A. H., Bernard, K., Schein, S. S., Roben, C. K. P., & Dozier, M. (2022). Parent coaching fidelity trajectories of in-person and telehealth sessions during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(3), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2021.1996300

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant), Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Gaudreau, C., Delgado, A., Confair-Jones, R., Flambaum, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Raby, K. L., Dozier, M., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2024). The unanticipated side effects of an attachment intervention: Parents ask higher quality questions. Developmental Psychology, 60(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001707

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Hussaini, S. K., Holley, P., & Ritenour, D. (2011). Reducing low birth weight infancy: Assessing the effectiveness of the Health Start program in Arizona. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15, 225–233.

Model(s) Reviewed: Arizona Health Start Program

View Manuscript
On hold
Exclusively reports subgroup findings, pending replication

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Labella, M. H., Raby, K. L., Bourne, S. V., Trahan, A. C., Katz, D., & Dozier, M. (2024). Is Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up effective for parents with insecure attachment states of mind? Child Development, 95(2), 648-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14002

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant), Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible comparison

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Liming, K. W., Grube, W., Lloyd Sieger, M. H., Brook, J., Berryhill, E., Akin, B. A., & Mendenhall, A. (2024). Child Welfare Outcomes After Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up Intervention Participation: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Child Maltreatment, 30(2), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595241265968.
 

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Lind, T., Raby, K. L., Caron, E. B., Roben, C. K., & Dozier, M. (2017). Enhancing executive functioning among toddlers in foster care with an attachment-based intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 29(2), 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579417000190 [Study 2: Non-experimental design].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Lind, T., Raby, K. L., Caron, E. B., Roben, C. K., & Dozier, M. (2017). Enhancing executive functioning among toddlers in foster care with an attachment-based intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 29(2), 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579417000190 [Study 1: Randomized controlled trial].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

McCue, K., Sabo, S., Wightman, P., Jimenez, D., & Rumann, S. (2021). Health Start program evaluation, 2006-2016: Final impact report. Arizona Department of Health Services. Retrieved from https://azdhs.gov/documents/prevention/womens-childrens-health/reports-…

Model(s) Reviewed: Arizona Health Start Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Raby, K. L., Freedman, E., Yarger, H. A., Lind, T., & Dozier, M. (2018). Enhancing the language development of toddlers in foster care by promoting foster parents-™ sensitivity: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science, https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12753.

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Sabo, S. (2020). Arizona Health Start evaluation report. Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University.

Model(s) Reviewed: Arizona Health Start Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download