Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 301 - 310 of 380, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Raby, K. L., Freedman, E., Yarger, H. A., Lind, T., & Dozier, M. (2018). Enhancing the language development of toddlers in foster care by promoting foster parents-™ sensitivity: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science, , e1

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC) -Toddler

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Raikes, H., Chazan-Cohen, R., & Jones Harden, B. (2018). Early Steps to School Success: Summary of preliminary evaluation results, January 2018. Report submitted to HomVEE in January 2018.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Steps to School Success™-Home Visiting

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Raikes, H., Jones Harden, B., Chazan-Cohen, R., Nord, J., Deming, J., Esteraich, J., & Drouin Duncan, A. (2018). Early Steps to School Success program evaluation: A rural community-wide approach. Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE in January 2019.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Steps to School Success™-Home Visiting

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Raikes, H. H., Roggman, L. A., Peterson, C. A., Brooks-Gunn, J., Chazan-Cohen, R., Zhang, X., & Schiffman, R. F. (2014). Theories of change and outcomes in home-based Early Head Start programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 574-585.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Raikes, H., Roggman, L., Peterson, C., Constantine, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Chazan-Cohen, R. (2003). Theories of change and outcomes in Early Head Start home-based programs. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Raskin, M., Easterbrooks, M. A., Fauth, R. C., Jacobs, F., Fosse, N. E., Goldberg, J. L., & Mistry, J. (2017). Patterns of goal attainment among young mothers in a home visiting program. Applied Developmental Science, 1–13.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Raskin, M., Fosse, N. E., Fauth, R. C., Bumgarner, E., & Easterbrooks, M. A. (2015). Relationship types among adolescent parents participating in a home-visiting program: A latent-transition analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ratcliff, A. C. (2016). Early experiences and the effect on kindergarten screening (Doctoral dissertation, Southwest Baptist University).

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Reuben, J. D., Shaw, D. S., Brennan, L. M., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). A family-based intervention for improving children’s emotional problems through effects on maternal depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(6), 1142.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Riggs, J. L., Rosenblum, K. L., Muzik, M., Jester, J., Freeman, S., Huth-Bocks, A., Waddell, R., Alfafara, E., Miller, A., Lawler, J., Erickson, N., Weatherston, D., Shah, P., Brophy-Herb, H., & Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research. (2022). Infant mental health home visiting mitigates impact of maternal adverse childhood experiences on toddler language competence: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 43(4), e227–e236. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001020

Model(s) Reviewed: Michigan Model of Infant Mental Health-Home Visiting (Michigan IMH-HV)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download