Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 891 - 900 of 2005, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Jonson-Reid, M., & Stahlschmidt, M.J. (2010). Child abuse prevention final report. Report to the Missouri Department of Social Services Children's Division & Nurses for Newborns Foundation. St. Louis, MO: Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurses for Newborns®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Judson, C. J. (2007). The effect of the Even Start early childhood program upon elementary school student achievement, attendance, grade progression, special education placement and disciplinary referrals. (University of Texas at Austin; 0227 Advisor: Adviser James R. Yates). Dissertation Abstracts International, 68 (10A), 131-4190. (AAI3285940)

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Juffer, F., & Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J. (2018). Working with Video‐feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP‐SD): A case study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(8), 1346–1357.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Juffer, F., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (Eds.). (2012). Promoting Positive Parenting: An Attachment-Based Intervention. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Juffer, F., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2017). Pairing attachment theory and social learning theory in video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 189–194.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Juffer, F., Struis, E., Werner, C., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2017). Effective preventive interventions to support parents of young children: Illustrations from the Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD). Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 45(3), 202–214.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Julian, M. M., Riggs, J., Wong, K., Lawler, J. M., Brophy-Herb, H. E., Ribaudo, J., Stacks, A., Jester, J. M., Pitzen, J., Rosenblum, K. L., Muzik, M., & Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research. (2023). Relationships reduce risks for child maltreatment: Results of an experimental trial of infant mental health home visiting. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 979740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.979740

Model(s) Reviewed: Michigan Model of Infant Mental Health-Home Visiting (Michigan IMH-HV)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Julnes, G., Konefal, M., Pindur, W., & Kim, P. (1994). Community-based perinatal care for disadvantaged adolescents: Evaluation of the Resource Mothers Program. Journal of Community Health, 19(1), 41–53.

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

June, K. J., Lee, J. Y., & Cho, S. H. (2021). Infant mother's experiences with the sustained nurse home-visiting program. Journal of The Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health, 25(1), 31–41.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Manuscript is not written in English

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Jung, S., & Stone, S. (2008). Sociodemographic and programmatic moderators of Early Head Start: Evidence from the national Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project. Children & Schools, 30(3), 149–157.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download