Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 271 - 280 of 328, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Shenk, C. E., Ammerman, R. T., Teeters, A. R., Bensman, H. E., Allen, E. K., Putnam, F. W., & Van Ginkel, J. B. (2017). Erratum to: History of maltreatment in childhood and subsequent parenting stress in at-risk, first-time mothers: Identifying points of intervention during home visiting. Prevention Science, 18(3), 371–371.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shin, S.H. & Choi, C. (2023). Improving birth outcomes among low-income families: The effect of a home visiting intervention. Clinical Pediatrics, 62(11), 1375–1379. https://doi:10.1177/00099228231158367

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Moore, K. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Effects of video feedback on early coercive parent–child interactions: The intervening role of caregivers’ relational schemas. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42(3), 405–417.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Negative relational schemas predict the trajectory of coercive dynamics during early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(4), 693–703.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, K.E., Landry, S.H. & Swank, P.R. (2005). The influence of decreased parental resources on the efficacy of a responsive parenting intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), pp. 711-720.

Model(s) Reviewed: Play and Learning Strategies (PALS)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Montaño, Z., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Erratum to: Preventing weight gain and obesity: Indirect effects of the family check-up in early childhood. Prevention Science, 16(3), 420.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Montaño, Z., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Preventing weight gain and obesity: Indirect effects of the family check-up in early childhood. Prevention Science, 16(3), 408–419.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Wakschlag, L., Krogh-Jespersen, S., Walkup, J. T., Wilson, M. N., Dishion, T. J., & Shaw, D. S. (2019). Dysregulated irritability as a window on young children's psychiatric risk: Transdiagnostic effects via the Family Check-Up. Development and Psychopathology, 31(5), 1887–1899.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it does not provide adequate information to determine whether outcome measures are valid or reliable.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Sonuga‐Barke, E. J., Thompson, M., Daley, D., & Laver‐Bradbury, C. (2004). Parent training for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Is it as effective when delivered as routine rather than as specialist care? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 449–457.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797–809. Study 2.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1
Download