Research database

Displaying 91 - 100 of 131
Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Cheong, J., Chang, H., Gardner, F., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2012). Behavioral control in at-risk toddlers: The influence of the family check-up. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41(3), 288–301.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Low
Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2018). Effects of the Family Check–Up on reducing growth in conduct problems from toddlerhood through school age: An analysis of moderated mediation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology86(10), 856–867.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Shepard, S., Armstrong, L. M., Silver, R. B., Berger, R., & Seifer, R. (2012). Embedding the family check-up and evidence-based parenting programmes in Head Start to increase parent engagement and reduce conduct problems in young children. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 5(3), 194–207.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Sitnick, S. L., Shaw, D. S., Gill, A., Dishion, T., Winter, C., Waller, R., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. (2015). Parenting and the family check-up: Changes in observed parent-child interaction following early childhood intervention. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(6), 970–984.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: High
Smedler, A. C., Hjern, A., Wiklund, S., Anttila, S., & Pettersson, A. (2015). Programs for prevention of externalizing problems in children: Limited evidence for effect beyond 6 months post-intervention. Child & Youth Care Forum, 44(2), 251–276.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Smith, J. D. (2016). Changing Parental Perspectives of Coercion Dynamics. In T. J. Dishion & J, Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Coercive Relationship Dynamics (pp. 313-329). New York, NY: Oxford.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Smith, J. D., Berkel, C., Hails, K. A., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2016). Predictors of participation in the family check-up program: A randomized trial of yearly services from age 2 to 10 years. Prevention Science, 1–11.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Smith, J. D., Berkel, C., Hails, K. A., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2018). Predictors of participation in the Family Check–Up program: A randomized trial of yearly services from age 2 to 10 years. Prevention Science19(5), 652–662.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Brown, K., Ramos, K., Knoble, N. B., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2016). An experimental study of procedures to enhance ratings of fidelity to an evidence-based family intervention. Prevention Science, 17(1), 62–70.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Moore, K. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Effects of video feedback on early coercive parent–child interactions: The intervening role of caregivers’ relational schemas. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42(3), 405–417.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Low