Research database

Displaying 2381 - 2390 of 2490
West, A. L. (2015). The benefits and costs of caring: A mixed-methods study of Early Head Start home visitors [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/benefits-costs-caring-mix…
Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Rating: Does not pass screens
West, A. L., Berlin, L. J., & Harden, B. J. (2018). Occupational stress and well-being among Early Head Start home visitors: A mixed methods study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 44, 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.11.003
Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Westat, Chapin Hall Center for Children, & James Bell Associates (2002). Evaluation of family preservation and reunification programs: Final report. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
Model(s) reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Westbrook, T. R. (2012). Supporting optimal child development through Early Head Start and Head Start programs: Secondary data analyses of FACES and EHSREP: An introduction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(4), 571.
Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Rating: Does not pass screens
Westheimer, M. (2003). On Hugh McLean's evaluation of HIPPY outcomes in South Africa. In M. Westheimer (Ed.), Parents making a difference: International research on the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) program (Chapter 12).The Hebrew University Magnes Press.
Model(s) reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Westheimer, M. (2003). Ready or not: One home-based response to the school readiness dilemma. In M. Westheimer (Ed.), Parents making a difference: International research on the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) program (Chapter 1).The Hebrew University Magnes Press.
Model(s) reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Westrupp, E. M., Northam, E., Lee, K. J., Scratch, S. E., & Cameron, F. (2015). Reducing and preventing internalizing and externalizing behavior problems in children with type 1 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial of the Triple P‐Positive Parenting Program. Pediatric Diabetes, 16(7), 554–563.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Wettach, R., & Aebi, M. (2016). Pilotstudie zur Wirksamkeit einer multimodalen Gruppenbehandlung für Kinder mit einer Störung des Sozialverhaltens mit oppositionellem, aufsässigem Verhalten in der klinischen Grundversorgung [Pilot study on the effectiveness of a multimodal group treatment for children with oppositional defiant disorder in clinical primary care]. Zeitschrift fur Kinder-und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 44(3), 220–230.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Wheeler, R., Ludtke, M., Helmer, J., Barna, N., Wilson, K., & Oleksiak, C. (2013). Implementation of the PICCOLO in infant mental health practice: A case study. Infant Mental Health Journal, 34(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21395
Model(s) reviewed: Michigan Infant Mental Health–Home Visiting (IMH–HV)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Wheeler, W. H. (1994). A study of the Missouri Parents as Teachers program and its effect on the readiness skills of children entering kindergarten in southwest Missouri public schools. Blue Eye, MO: Blue Eye School District.
Model(s) reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®
Rating: Low