Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2022

Effects shown in research

Child development and school readiness

Findings rated high

Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT)
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R): Distress to limitations

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

240 children Unadjusted mean = 3.85 Unadjusted mean = 4.08 Mean difference = -0.23 HomVEE calculated = -0.33

Statistically significant, p <.05

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R): Falling reactivity

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

240 children Unadjusted mean = 2.60 Unadjusted mean = 2.85 Mean difference = -0.25 HomVEE calculated = -0.36

Statistically significant, p <.01

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R): Fear

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

240 children Unadjusted mean = 2.97 Unadjusted mean = 2.95 Mean difference = 0.02 HomVEE calculated = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p= 0.86

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R): Negativity

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

240 children Unadjusted mean = 3.16 Unadjusted mean = 3.30 Mean difference = -0.14 HomVEE calculated = -0.26

Statistically significant, p <.05

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R): Negativity

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

16 weeks old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 3.25 Unadjusted mean = 3.46 Mean difference = -0.21 HomVEE calculated = -0.24

Not statistically significant, p <.10

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R): Regulation

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

240 children Unadjusted mean = 4.73 Unadjusted mean = 4.79 Mean difference = -0.06 HomVEE calculated = -0.11

Not statistically significant, p= 0.39

Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R): Regulation

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

16 weeks old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 5.42 Unadjusted mean = 5.37 Mean difference = 0.05 HomVEE calculated = 0.07

Not statistically significant, p = 0.58

Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R): Sadness

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

240 children Unadjusted mean = 3.22 Unadjusted mean = 3.32 Mean difference = -0.10 HomVEE calculated = -0.13

Not statistically significant, p= 0.29

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Negativity score during toy removal (toy removal frustration task)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 0.67 Unadjusted mean = 0.67 Mean difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p= 0.99

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Negativity score during toy return (toy removal frustration task)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 0.41 Unadjusted mean = 0.41 Mean difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p= 0.96

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Other regulation during toy removal (toy removal frustration task)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 64.70 Unadjusted mean = 66.80 Mean difference = -2.10 HomVEE calculated = -0.12

Not statistically significant, p= 0.36

Other regulation during toy return (toy removal frustration task)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 89.70 Unadjusted mean = 92.30 Mean difference = -2.60 HomVEE calculated = -0.17

Not statistically significant, p= 0.22

Self-soothing by orienting (toy removal frustration task)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 8.00 Unadjusted mean = 7.40 Mean difference = 0.60 HomVEE calculated = 0.07

Not statistically significant, p= 0.39

Self-soothing by self-comforting (toy removal frustration task)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 12.00 Unadjusted mean = 7.80 Mean difference = 4.20 HomVEE calculated = 0.28

Statistically significant, p <.05

Self-soothing strategy (any) during toy removal (toy removal frustration task)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 41.90 Unadjusted mean = 41.90 Mean difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p= 1.00

Self-soothing strategy (any) during toy return (toy removal frustration task)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

1 year old

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

230 children Unadjusted mean = 18.80 Unadjusted mean = 13.90 Mean difference = 4.90 HomVEE calculated = 0.30

Statistically significant, p <.05

View Revisions