Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)® Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2022

Effects shown in research

Linkages and referrals

Findings rated high

Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Referred to resources (prenatal)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

35 weeks gestation

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

105 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.70 Unadjusted proportion = 0.14 Difference = 0.56 Study reported = 1.49

Statistically significant, p <.01

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Referred to resources at 6 months postpartum

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Davidson County, Tennessee, 2014-2016, full sample

178 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 1.00 Unadjusted proportion = 0.28 Difference = 0.72 HomVEE calculated = 4.77

Statistically significant, p = 0.02

Findings rated moderate

Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Referred to resources (postpartum)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

110 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.95 Unadjusted proportion = 0.25 Difference = 0.70 HomVEE calculated = 2.43

Statistically significant, p <.01

View Revisions