Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Barnet, B., Rapp, T., DeVoe, M., & Mullins, C. D. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of a motivational intervention to reduce rapid repeated childbearing in high-risk adolescent mothers: A rebirth of economic and policy considerations. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 164(4), 370-376.

Model(s) Reviewed: Computer-Assisted Motivational Intervention plus enhanced home visiting (CAMI+), Computer-Assisted Motivational Intervention (CAMI)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Brickhouse, T.H., Haldiman, R.R., & Evani, B. (2013). The impact of a home visiting program on children’s utilization of dental services. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2) S147–S152. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021N 

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Deater-Deckard, K., & Haldiman, R.R. (n.d.). Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) home-visiting asthma case management program: Preliminary results. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Meghea, C. I., Raffo, J. E., Yu, X., Meng, R., Luo, Z., Vander Meulen, P., Sanchez Lloyd, C., & Roman, L. A. (2023). Community health worker home visiting, birth outcomes, maternal care, and disparities among birthing individuals with Medicaid insurance. JAMA Pediatrics, 177(9), 939–946. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2310

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible comparison

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Meghea, C. I., Raffo, J. E., Zhu, Q., & Roman, L. (2013). Medicaid home visitation and maternal and infant healthcare utilization. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(4), 441–447.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Meghea, C. I., You, Z., Raffo, J., Leach, R. E., & Roman, L. A. (2015). Statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care programs and infant mortality. Pediatrics, 136(2), 334–342.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Meghea, C. I., You, Z., & Roman, L. A. (2015). A statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal and postnatal care program and infant injuries. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(10), 2119–2127.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Raffo, J. E., Titcombe, C., Henning, S., Meghea, C. I., Strutz, K. L., & Roman, L. A. (2021). Clinical-community linkages: The impact of standard care processes that engage Medicaid-eligible pregnant women in home visiting. Women’s Health Issues, 31(6), 532–539.
https://doi:10.1016/j.whi.2021.06.006

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible comparison

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Roman, L., Raffo, J. E., Zhu, Q., & Meghea, C. (2014). A statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care program: Impact on birth outcomes. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(3), 220–227.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shin, S.H. & Choi, C. (2023). Improving birth outcomes among low-income families: The effect of a home visiting intervention. Clinical Pediatrics, 62(11), 1375–1379. doi: 10.1177/00099228231158367

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download