Early Head Start—Home-based option Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2024

Effects shown in research

Positive parenting practices

Findings rated high

Early Head Start Home-based option
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
HOME Language and Literacy
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 5 Home-based program approach Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = 0.16 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Children's books (26 or more)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 5 Home-based program approach Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = 0.14 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Parent supportiveness during play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 5 Home-based program approach Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percent reading daily
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 5 Home-based program approach Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = 0.15 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Percent spanked last week
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 5 Home-based program approach Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Submitted by user on
Negative value favors the intervention.
Teaching activities
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 5 Home-based program approach Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = 0.15 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Early Head Start Home-based option
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance

Three-Bag Task composite score of parental supportiveness (fixed effect random slope analysis)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

EHS-HBO vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2014, United States, full sample

397 mothers Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = 0.05

Not statistically significant, p= 0.62

Three-Bag Task composite score of parental supportiveness (restricted maximum likelihood analysis)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

EHS-HBO vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2014, United States, full sample

397 mothers Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = 0.05

Not statistically significant, p= 0.64

Three-Bag Task composite score of parental supportiveness (split-sample analysis)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

EHS-HBO vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2014, United States, full sample

397 mothers Not reported Not reported Difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p= 0.99

Early Head Start Home-based option
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Physical punishment (24 months)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
24 months one site from larger EHS evaluation Not reported Not reported coeff = 0.04 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Submitted by user on
High score equals unfavorable.
Physical punishment (36 months)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
36 months one site from larger EHS evaluation Not reported Not reported coeff = -0.22 Not available Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Submitted by user on
Higher score equals unfavorable; Note that this outcome measures the incremental impact between 24 months and 36 months
Early Head Start Home-based option
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
HOME absence of punitive interactions
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 4.30 Adjusted mean = 4.30 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
HOME emotional responsivity
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 6.50 Adjusted mean = 6.40 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
HOME maternal verbal/social skills
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 2.90 Adjusted mean = 2.90 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
HOME support of cognitive, language, and literacy environment
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 10.30 Adjusted mean = 10.10 Mean difference = 0.20 Study reported = 0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
HOME total score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 26.90 Adjusted mean = 26.40 Mean difference = 0.50 Study reported = 0.13 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
KIDI
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 3.40 Adjusted mean = 3.30 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.17 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Covers electric outlets (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 61.00 % = 57.20 = -3.80 Study reported = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Has gates or doors in front of stairs (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 72.70 % = 75.50 = -2.80 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Has poison control number (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 36.50 % = 36.40 = 0.10 Study reported = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Has syrup of Ipecac at home (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 30.20 % = 30.60 = -0.40 Study reported = -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Home has working smoke alarm (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 83.20 % = 83.30 = -0.01 Study reported = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Index of discipline severity
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 2.50 Adjusted mean = 2.60 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Observed child play area is safe (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 74.60 % = 74.20 = 0.04 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Parent-child activities to stimulate cognitive and language development
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 4.50 Adjusted mean = 4.50 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents and children that have regular bedtime routines
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 69.20 % = 65.10 = 4.10 Study reported = 0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents suggesting only mild responses to the hypothetical conflicts
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 48.00 % = 45.10 = 2.90 Study reported = 0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that read to child as part of bedtime routine
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 26.00 % = 19.50 = 6.50 Study reported = 0.16 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Percentage of parents that read to child daily
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 55.50 % = 54.40 = 1.10 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that set a regular bedtime for child
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 58.70 % = 54.00 = 4.70 Study reported = 0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that suggest responses to hypothetical conflict with child: Physical punishment
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 23.00 % = 26.10 = -3.10 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that suggest responses to hypothetical conflict with child: Prevent or distract
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 69.60 % = 66.60 = 3.00 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that suggest responses to hypothetical conflict with child: Remove child or object
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 78.60 % = 80.40 = -1.80 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that suggest responses to hypothetical conflict with child: Shout
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 6.00 % = 3.60 = 2.40 Study reported = 0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that suggest responses to hypothetical conflict with child: Talk and explain
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 34.10 % = 28.10 = 6.00 Study reported = 0.13 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that suggest responses to hypothetical conflict with child: Threaten or command
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 28.80 % = 28.20 = 0.50 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Reading frequency
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children Adjusted mean = 4.60 Adjusted mean = 4.60 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Spanked child in last week (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 49.00 % = 52.40 = -3.40 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Uses a car seat (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 81.10 % = 80.70 = 0.04 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Uses guards or gates for windows (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 966 children % = 52.60 % = 55.40 = -2.80 Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Findings rated moderate

Early Head Start Home-based option
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
HOME harshness
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children Adjusted mean = 0.30 Adjusted mean = 0.30 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
HOME internal physical environment
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children Adjusted mean = 8.00 Adjusted mean = 8.00 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
HOME total score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children Adjusted mean = 28.30 Adjusted mean = 28.10 Mean difference = 0.20 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
HOME warmth
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children Adjusted mean = 2.70 Adjusted mean = 2.70 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
HOME: support of language and learning
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children Adjusted mean = 10.90 Adjusted mean = 10.70 Mean difference = 0.20 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Detachment during parent-child puzzle challenge tasks
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.60 Adjusted mean = 1.60 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Detachment during parent-child semi-structured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.20 Adjusted mean = 1.30 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Index of severity of discipline strategies
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children Adjusted mean = 3.30 Adjusted mean = 3.30 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Intrusiveness during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 2.50 Adjusted mean = 2.60 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Intrusiveness during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.60 Adjusted mean = 1.60 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Negative regard during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.20 Adjusted mean = 1.30 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Parent-child play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.40 Adjusted mean = 4.40 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of children that follow a bedtime routine
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children % = 72.00 % = 71.00 = 1.00 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of children with a regular bedtime
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children % = 59.30 % = 55.60 = 3.70 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents suggesting physical punishment as a discipline strategy
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children = 44.90 = 44.50 = 0.40 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that read to child at bedtime
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children % = 29.60 % = 25.80 = 3.80 Study reported = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that read to child daily
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children % = 54.50 % = 55.70 = -1.20 Study reported = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that spanked child in the past week
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children % = 44.10 % = 49.60 = -5.50 Study reported = -0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that usually use a car seat correctly
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children = 70.40 = 69.40 = 1.00 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage of parents that would use mild discipline only
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 950 children = 45.80 = 45.90 = -0.10 Study reported = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Quality of assistance during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 3.60 Adjusted mean = 3.50 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Supportive presence during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.60 Adjusted mean = 4.50 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Supportiveness during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 EHS-HBO impact study 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.00 Adjusted mean = 3.90 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.16 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Early Head Start Home-based option
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Early Childhood Longitudinal Studies - Kindergarten Self Description Questionnaire (ECLS-K SDQ): Child relationship with the father

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Grade 5

EHS-HBO vs. comparison, 1996-1998, full sample

461 children Adjusted mean = 3.50 Adjusted mean = 3.50 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.01

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Family involvement in school

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Grade 5

EHS-HBO vs. comparison, 1996-1998, full sample

733 caregivers Adjusted proportion = 0.36 Adjusted proportion = 0.36 Difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) Inventory: Total score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Grade 5

EHS-HBO vs. comparison, 1996-1998, full sample

700 caregivers Adjusted mean = 27.40 Adjusted mean = 26.90 Mean difference = 0.50 Study reported = 0.12

Statistically significant, p <0.05

Parent supervision

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Grade 5

EHS-HBO vs. comparison, 1996-1998, full sample

704 caregivers Adjusted mean = 3.20 Adjusted mean = 3.20 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.02

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Parenting Stress Index (PSI): Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Grade 5

EHS-HBO vs. comparison, 1996-1998, full sample

746 caregivers Adjusted mean = 9.70 Adjusted mean = 10.30 Mean difference = -0.60 Study reported = -0.12

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Support for education: External to the home

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Grade 6

EHS-HBO vs. comparison, 1996-1998, full sample

737 caregivers Adjusted mean = -0.20 Adjusted mean = -0.40 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.03

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Support for education: Internal to the home

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Grade 5

EHS-HBO vs. comparison, 1996-1998, full sample

738 caregivers Adjusted mean = -0.20 Adjusted mean = -0.20 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.03

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Early Head Start Home-based option
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Parent-child structured play: Negative regard
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 794 children Adjusted mean = 1.40 Adjusted mean = 1.50 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Parent-child structured play: Parent detachment
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 794 children Adjusted mean = 1.40 Adjusted mean = 1.50 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.15 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Parent-child structured play: Parent intrusiveness
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 794 children Adjusted mean = 1.80 Adjusted mean = 1.90 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Parent-child structured play: Parent supportiveness
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 EHS-HBO impact study 794 children Adjusted mean = 4.00 Adjusted mean = 3.90 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
View Revisions