Preparing for Life—Home Visiting Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2023

Effects shown in research

Positive parenting practices

Findings rated high

Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI-2), Belief in the use of appropriate punishment score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted mean = 6.40 Unadjusted mean = 6.29 Mean difference = 0.11 Study reported = 0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.59

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale, Absence of hostility score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

171 children Unadjusted mean = 4.39 Unadjusted mean = 4.41 Mean difference = -0.02 Study reported = -0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.81

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale, Quality of attachment score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

169 children Unadjusted mean = 4.70 Unadjusted mean = 4.68 Mean difference = 0.02 HomVEE calculated = 0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.70

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Mother reads to her child every day, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

149 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.46 Unadjusted proportion = 0.53 Mean difference = -0.07 HomVEE calculated = -0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.39

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Mother reads to her child, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.90 Unadjusted proportion = 0.90 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p = 1.00

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Baby comparison scale score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

172 children Unadjusted mean = 7.52 Unadjusted mean = 7.02 Mean difference = 0.50 Study reported = 0.26

Not statistically significant, p = 0.09

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental hostile-reactive behaviors score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

171 children Unadjusted mean = 0.80 Unadjusted mean = 1.06 Mean difference = -0.26 Study reported = -0.22

Not statistically significant, p = 0.15

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental overprotection score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

172 children Unadjusted mean = 6.18 Unadjusted mean = 6.13 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.88

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental warmth score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

171 children Unadjusted mean = 9.18 Unadjusted mean = 9.25 Mean difference = -0.07 Study reported = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.71

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Perceived parental impact score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

172 children Unadjusted mean = 7.25 Unadjusted mean = 7.04 Mean difference = 0.21 Study reported = 0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.52

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Locus of Control Scale (PLOC), Control of child's behavior score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 children Unadjusted mean = 6.92 Unadjusted mean = 7.22 Mean difference = -0.30 Study reported = -0.11

Not statistically significant, p = 0.47

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME), Involvement scale
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months old High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample 168 mothers Unadjusted mean = 4.27 Unadjusted mean = 4.41 Mean difference = -0.14 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p= 0.80
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME), Responsivity scale
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months old High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample 165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 9.00 Unadjusted mean = 8.95 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p= 0.56
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME), Learning Materials scale
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months old High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample 168 mothers Unadjusted mean = 8.08 Unadjusted mean = 7.74 Mean difference = 0.34 Study reported = 0.29 Statistically significant, p= 0.02
Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Appropriateness of baby sleeping location

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.90 Unadjusted proportion = 0.99 Mean difference = -0.09 Study reported = -0.39

Statistically significant, p = 0.03

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Baby has appropriate sleep preparation

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.48 Unadjusted proportion = 0.39 Mean difference = 0.09 Study reported = 0.19

Not statistically significant, p = 0.24

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS), Absence of Hostility

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 4.39 Unadjusted mean = 4.41 Mean difference = -0.02 Study reported = -0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.80

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS), Quality of Attachment

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 4.69 Unadjusted mean = 4.68 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.03

Not statistically significant, p = 0.85

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS), total score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 85.86 Unadjusted mean = 85.92 Mean difference = -0.06 Study reported = -0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.94

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Mother interaction with baby (items adapted from My Baby and Me program and Parenting for the First Time program)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 2.79 Unadjusted mean = 2.66 Mean difference = 0.13 Study reported = 0.22

Not statistically significant, p = 0.14

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Mother uses baby safety gate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

151 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.19 Unadjusted proportion = 0.13 Mean difference = 0.06 Study reported = 0.15

Not statistically significant, p = 0.32

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Mother uses electrical socket covers

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

168 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.43 Unadjusted proportion = 0.33 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.20

Not statistically significant, p = 0.18

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Baby Comparison

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 7.52 Unadjusted mean = 7.04 Mean difference = 0.48 Study reported = 0.26

Not statistically significant, p = 0.10

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Hostile-reactive Behavior

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 0.80 Unadjusted mean = 1.04 Mean difference = -0.24 Study reported = -0.20

Not statistically significant, p = 0.18

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Impact

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 7.25 Unadjusted mean = 7.07 Mean difference = 0.18 Study reported = 0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.58

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Over-protection

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 6.18 Unadjusted mean = 6.14 Mean difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.90

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Self-efficacy

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 8.80 Unadjusted mean = 8.67 Mean difference = 0.13 Study reported = 0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.47

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Warmth

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 9.18 Unadjusted mean = 9.24 Mean difference = -0.06 Study reported = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.75

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Locus of Control Scale (PLOC), overall score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 44.27 Unadjusted mean = 45.54 Mean difference = -1.27 Study reported = -0.16

Not statistically significant, p = 0.29

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Locus of Control Scale (PLOC), Parental Belief in Fate/Chance

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 9.70 Unadjusted mean = 9.97 Mean difference = -0.27 Study reported = -0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.61

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Satisfied with father's involvement

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 62.26 Unadjusted mean = 64.40 Mean difference = -2.14 Study reported = -0.25

Not statistically significant, p = 0.11

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d
Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Appropriate parent-child roles

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 6.11 Unadjusted mean = 6.07 Mean difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.91

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Belief in the use of inappropriate punishment- At risk cut-off

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.00 Unadjusted proportion = 0.02 Mean difference = -0.02 Study reported = -0.22

Not statistically significant, p = 0.63

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Inappropriate parent-child roles- At risk cut-off

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.12 Unadjusted proportion = 0.12 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p = 1.00

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Parental empathy

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 4.93 Unadjusted mean = 4.92 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.98

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Parental lack of empathy- At risk of cut-off

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.34 Unadjusted proportion = 0.24 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.22

Not statistically significant, p = 0.16

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Realistic parental expectations of children

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 6.62 Unadjusted mean = 6.46 Mean difference = 0.16 Study reported = 0.09

Not statistically significant, p = 0.59

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), total number of scales at risk

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.76 Unadjusted mean = 0.76 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p = 1.00

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Total score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 124.18 Unadjusted mean = 125.71 Mean difference = -1.53 Study reported = -0.11

Not statistically significant, p = 0.47

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Unrealistic parental expectations of children- At risk cut-off

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.06 Unadjusted proportion = 0.05 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.78

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Appropriate parent-child roles, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 28.04 Unadjusted mean = 27.78 Mean difference = 0.26 HomVEE calculated = -0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.59

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Belief in the use of appropriate punishment, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 45.84 Unadjusted mean = 45.14 Mean difference = 0.70 HomVEE calculated = 0.30

Not statistically significant, p = 0.054

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Belief in the use of inappropriate punishment- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.00 Unadjusted mean = 0.02 Mean difference = -0.02 HomVEE calculated = 0.19

Not statistically significant, p = 0.23

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Inappropriate parent-child roles- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.12 Unadjusted mean = 0.12 Mean difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = 0.15

Not statistically significant, p = 0.33

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Parental empathy, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 39.65 Unadjusted mean = 39.52 Mean difference = 0.13 HomVEE calculated = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.69

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Parental lack of empathy- At risk of cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.34 Unadjusted mean = 0.24 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.33

Statistically significant, p = 0.04

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Realistic parental expectations of children, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 25.17 Unadjusted mean = 24.64 Mean difference = 0.53 HomVEE calculated = -0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.52

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Unrealistic parental expectations of children- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.06 Unadjusted mean = 0.05 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.35

Statistically significant, p = 0.03

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Appropriateness of sleeping location

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

162 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.87 Unadjusted proportion = 0.95 Mean difference = -0.08 Study reported = -0.30

Not statistically significant, p = 0.09

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Family Environment Scale (FES), Cohesion Standard Score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted mean = 55.51 Unadjusted mean = 58.07 Mean difference = -2.56 Study reported = -0.27

Not statistically significant, p = 0.08

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Family Environment Scale (FES), Conflict Standard Score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted mean = 70.43 Unadjusted mean = 69.63 Mean difference = 0.80 Study reported = 0.09

Not statistically significant, p = 0.57

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Family Environment Scale (FES), Organisation Standard Score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted mean = 48.15 Unadjusted mean = 46.88 Mean difference = 1.27 Study reported = 0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.37

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Father has daily contact with child

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

164 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.68 Unadjusted proportion = 0.67 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.89

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Father part of child's life

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

164 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.94 Unadjusted proportion = 0.89 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.17

Not statistically significant, p = 0.26

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Satisfied with father's involvement

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 62.91 Unadjusted mean = 62.54 Mean difference = 0.37 Study reported = 0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.78

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d
Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS): Absence of hostility

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 4.36 Unadjusted mean = 4.40 Mean difference = -0.04 Study reported = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.63

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS): Quality of attachment

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 4.61 Unadjusted mean = 4.57 Mean difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.50

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS): Total score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 84.16 Unadjusted mean = 84.03 Mean difference = 0.13 Study reported = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.89

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Father has contact with child daily

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

163 mothers and children Unadjusted proportion = 0.66 Unadjusted proportion = 0.69 Mean difference = -0.03 Study reported = -0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.68

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Baby comparison score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 7.04 Unadjusted mean = 6.41 Mean difference = 0.63 Study reported = 0.29

Not statistically significant, p = 0.07

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental hostile-reactive behavior

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 1.78 Unadjusted mean = 1.94 Mean difference = -0.16 Study reported = -0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.51

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental impact

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 7.97 Unadjusted mean = 7.50 Mean difference = 0.47 Study reported = 0.20

Not statistically significant, p = 0.21

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental over-protection

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 4.49 Unadjusted mean = 4.23 Mean difference = 0.26 Study reported = 0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.45

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental self efficacy

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 8.74 Unadjusted mean = 8.42 Mean difference = 0.32 Study reported = 0.29

Not statistically significant, p = 0.07

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental warmth

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 8.69 Unadjusted mean = 8.48 Mean difference = 0.21 Study reported = 0.15

Not statistically significant, p = 0.36

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

View Revisions