Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 7 of 7, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Comyn, J. (2019). Exploring stakeholders' perceptions of the impact, acceptability and feasibility of a video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting in foster care (VIPP-FC) (Publication No. 2467443133) [Doctoral thesis, University College London (United Kingdom]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

O’Farrelly, C., Watt, H., Babalis, D., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Barker, B., Byford, S., ... & Ramchandani, P. G. (2021). A brief home-based parenting intervention to reduce behavior problems in young children: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(6), 567-576.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Hodes, M. W., Meppelder, H. M., Schuengel, C., & Kef, S. (2014). Tailoring a video-feedback intervention for sensitive discipline to parents with intellectual disabilities: A process evaluation. Attachment & Human Development, 16(4), 387–401.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Meghea, C. I., You, Z., Raffo, J., Leach, R. E., & Roman, L. A. (2015). Statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care programs and infant mortality. Pediatrics, 136(2), 334–342.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Meghea, C. I., You, Z., & Roman, L. A. (2015). A statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal and postnatal care program and infant injuries. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(10), 2119–2127.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Negrão, M., Pereira, M., Soares, I., & Mesman, J. (2014). Enhancing positive parent-child interactions and family functioning in a poverty sample: A randomized control trial. Attachment & Human Development, 16(4), 315-328.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Roman, L., Raffo, J. E., Zhu, Q., & Meghea, C. (2014). A statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care program: Impact on birth outcomes. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(3), 220–227.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download