Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 8 of 8, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Abikoff, H. B., Thompson, M., Laver‐Bradbury, C., Long, N., Forehand, R. L., Miller Brotman, L., Laver- Klein, R.G., Reiss, P., Huo, L., & Sonuga‐Barke, E. (2015). Parent training for preschool ADHD: A randomized controlled trial of specialized and generic programs. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(6), 618–631. Study 1.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Abikoff, H. B., Thompson, M., Laver‐Bradbury, C., Long, N., Forehand, R. L., Miller Brotman, L., Laver- Klein, R.G., Reiss, P., Huo, L., & Sonuga‐Barke, E. (2015). Parent training for preschool ADHD: A randomized controlled trial of specialized and generic programs. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(6), 618–631. Study 2.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Comyn, J. (2019). Exploring stakeholders' perceptions of the impact, acceptability and feasibility of a video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting in foster care (VIPP-FC) (Publication No. 2467443133) [Doctoral thesis, University College London (United Kingdom]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

O’Farrelly, C., Watt, H., Babalis, D., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Barker, B., Byford, S., ... & Ramchandani, P. G. (2021). A brief home-based parenting intervention to reduce behavior problems in young children: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(6), 567-576.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Hodes, M. W., Meppelder, H. M., Schuengel, C., & Kef, S. (2014). Tailoring a video-feedback intervention for sensitive discipline to parents with intellectual disabilities: A process evaluation. Attachment & Human Development, 16(4), 387–401.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Negrão, M., Pereira, M., Soares, I., & Mesman, J. (2014). Enhancing positive parent-child interactions and family functioning in a poverty sample: A randomized control trial. Attachment & Human Development, 16(4), 315-328.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797–809. Study 2.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797-809. Study 1. 

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1
Download XLSX