Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 14, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Holmberg, John; Luckey, Dennis; Olds, David. (2011) Teacher data for the Denver Year-9 follow-up. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Koniak-Griffin, D., Anderson, N. L., Brecht, M. L., Verzemnieks, I., Lesser, J., & Kim, S. (2002). Public health nursing care for adolescent mothers: Impact on infant health and selected maternal outcomes at 1 year postbirth. Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 30(1), 44–54.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Koniak-Griffin, D., Anderson, N. L., Verzemnieks, I., & Brecht, M. L. (2000). A public health nursing early intervention program for adolescent mothers: Outcomes from pregnancy through 6 weeks postpartum. Nursing Research, 49(3), 130–138.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Koniak-Griffin, D., Mathenge, C., Anderson, N. L., & Verzemnieks, I. (1999). An early intervention program for adolescent mothers: A nursing demonstration project. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 28(1), 51–59.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Koniak-Griffin, D., Verzemnieks, I. L., Anderson, N. L., Brecht, M. L., Lesser, J., Kim, S., et al. (2003). Nurse visitation for adolescent mothers: Two-year infant health and maternal outcomes. Nursing Research, 52(2), 127–136.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Miller, Ted R., Olds, David, Knudtson, Michael, Luckey, Dennis, Bondy, Jessica, & Stevenson, Amanda. (2011) Return on investment: Nurse and paraprofessional home visitation, Denver. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Navaie-Waliser, M. (2000). An evaluation of the participants, impacts, and cost-effectiveness of the North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Worker program. (home visitation, care coordination, infants). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(7-B), 3239.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Navaie-Waliser, M., Martin, S. L., Campbell, M. K., Tessaro, I., Kotelchuck, M., & Cross, A. W. (2000). Factors predicting completion of a home visitation program by high-risk pregnant women: The North Carolina Maternal Outreach Worker program. American Journal of Public Health, 90(1), 121-124.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes; Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Navaie-Waliser, M., Martin, S. L., Tessaro, I., Campbell, M. K., & Cross, A. W. (2000). Social support and psychological functioning among high-risk mothers: The impact of the Baby Love Maternal Outreach Worker program. Public Health Nursing, 17(4), 280-291.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Olds, D. L., Holmberg, J. R., Donelan-McCall, N., Luckey, D. W., Knudtson, M. D., & Robinson, J. (2014). Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses on children follow-up of a randomized trial at ages 6 and 9 years. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(2), 114-121.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®, NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download